Level:
Correct: 0
Incorrect: 0
Marks: 0/0
Exam Practice
Subject:
Topics:
AQA GCSE Chemistry Smart practice A mixed round aimed at your weak spots
Unit 1
Atomic structure and the periodic table
Unit 2
Bonding, structure, and the properties of matter
Unit 3
Quantitative chemistry
Unit 4
Chemical changes
Unit 5
Energy changes
Unit 6
The rate and extent of chemical change
Unit 7
Organic chemistry
Unit 8
Chemical analysis
Unit 9
Chemistry of the atmosphere
Unit 10
Using resources
Avg
score:
–
Topics
done:
0/124

Development of the periodic table

Practise 25 exam-style questions on Development of the periodic table for AQA GCSE Chemistry. Write your answer as you would in the exam and get it marked in seconds against the mark scheme, point by point, with an AI tutor on hand if you get stuck.

  • 25 questions
  • 1–6 marks each
  • Instant marking
  • No sign-up needed
20 questions, marked as you go

Sample questions with model answers

Here are 4 of the questions in this topic, each with a model answer, an explanation of why it earns the marks and the mark scheme an examiner would use.

Question 1

2 marks

Early scientists could not arrange the elements in order of atomic number.

Explain why.

Model answer

Protons, neutrons and electrons had not yet been discovered, so scientists did not know that atoms contain protons or how many protons each element has. The atomic number of each element was therefore unknown.

Explanation

The atomic number is the number of protons, so it could only be used to order the elements after the proton had been discovered in the early 1900s. Before that, atomic weight was the only measurable property available.

Mark scheme
  1. 1 mark

    protons (and neutrons and electrons) had not been discovered

  2. 1 mark

    so the atomic number / number of protons in each atom was not known

Question 2

2 marks

Suggest two reasons why Mendeleev's periodic table was more useful than earlier tables.

Model answer

Mendeleev's table could be used to predict the properties of elements that had not yet been discovered. It also kept elements with similar properties together in the same groups, so it could be used to predict how known elements would react.

Explanation

A useful classification groups similar things together and allows predictions. Mendeleev's gaps and changes of order made both possible.

Mark scheme
  1. 1 mark

    it could be used to predict the properties of undiscovered elements

    max 2

  2. 1 mark

    elements with similar properties were always in the same group

  3. 1 mark

    it left room for new elements to be added when discovered

Question 3

3 marks

When Mendeleev first published his periodic table, some scientists did not accept it.

Suggest why.

Model answer

Mendeleev left gaps for elements that no one had discovered, and at first there was no evidence that these elements existed. He also did not always follow the order of atomic weights, which seemed to go against the measured data. Scientists only became convinced when elements were discovered that filled the gaps with the properties he had predicted.

Explanation

New scientific ideas are often treated with caution until there is evidence for them. Mendeleev's table was accepted once its predictions were confirmed.

Mark scheme
  1. 1 mark

    he left gaps for elements that no one had discovered

    max 3

  2. 1 mark

    there was no evidence at first that these missing elements existed

  3. 1 mark

    he did not always follow the order of atomic weights / he swapped some elements

  4. 1 mark

    it was a new idea that challenged the tables other scientists were using

Question 4

4 marks

Compare Mendeleev's periodic table with the modern periodic table.

Model answer

Both tables put elements with similar properties into the same groups. However, Mendeleev ordered the elements by atomic weight, while the modern table orders them by atomic number. Mendeleev's table had gaps for undiscovered elements, but the modern table has no gaps and contains many more elements. Mendeleev's table also had no group for the noble gases, which the modern table includes as group 0.

Explanation

Each comparison should say how the two tables differ (or are the same) for the same feature. Ordering by atomic number is the key difference, because it removes the need to swap elements.

Mark scheme
  1. 1 mark

    Mendeleev ordered elements by atomic weight, but the modern table uses atomic number

    max 4

  2. 1 mark

    Mendeleev's table had gaps, but the modern table has no gaps

  3. 1 mark

    Mendeleev's table had no noble gases / group 0, but the modern table does

  4. 1 mark

    the modern table contains more elements

  5. 1 mark

    similarity: both arrange elements with similar properties in groups / columns

Ready to try the rest? Every answer you write is marked against the mark scheme, so you can see exactly where the marks are.

AI Tutor Hints first, answers after you try

Hi! Stuck? Ask me for a hint and I’ll help you work it out. Once you’ve checked your answer I can explain exactly where the marks are.