'The Antarctic Treaty has been successful in protecting Antarctica.'
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Model answer
I largely agree that the Antarctic Treaty has been successful in protecting Antarctica from direct human damage, but it cannot protect the continent from every threat.
The Treaty, signed in 1959 by 12 countries and now joined by more than 50, has achieved a great deal. Antarctica has remained free of military conflict, and because territorial claims were frozen, no country has been able to exploit the continent's resources for itself. Nuclear explosions and the dumping of radioactive waste are banned. The Treaty has also encouraged international scientific cooperation, leading to discoveries such as the ozone hole in 1985 and ice-core records of past climates.
The agreements linked to the Treaty have strengthened this protection. The Madrid Protocol, signed in 1991, banned mining and made Antarctica a natural reserve devoted to peace and science. All activities now need an environmental impact assessment, and waste must be removed from the continent. CCAMLR sets limits on fishing for krill and toothfish, and in 2016 its members agreed to create a huge marine protected area in the Ross Sea. As a result, Antarctica remains the least developed continent on Earth.
However, there are important limitations. Tourism has grown rapidly and is largely self-regulated by the tour operators' association, IAATO, rather than by binding laws. Research stations themselves have impacts through fuel use, waste and buildings. Fishing for krill is increasing, and because decisions require the agreement of every member, proposals for new marine protected areas have been blocked for years. The mining ban could be reviewed from 2048, when pressure for resources may be greater. Most importantly, the Treaty cannot stop climate change, which is causing ice shelves such as Larsen B to collapse and affecting krill and penguin populations.
Overall, I agree to a large extent. The Treaty has been remarkably successful at preventing the military use, mining and uncontrolled exploitation that have damaged other regions, which is why Antarctica is still a wilderness. But its success is limited by its reliance on consensus and voluntary rules for tourism, and it has no power over global climate change, which is now the greatest threat to Antarctica.
Explanation
Level 3 answers evaluate both what the Treaty system has achieved (peace, science, the mining ban, fishing controls) and what it has not (tourism, consensus problems, climate change), and reach a supported judgement such as 'successful against local threats but not global ones'. A description of the Treaty's rules without evaluation stays in Level 1 or 2.