Level:
Correct: 0
Incorrect: 0
Marks: 0/0
Exam Practice
Subject:
Topics:
AQA GCSE Geography (Paper 1) Smart practice A mixed round aimed at your weak spots
Unit 1
The challenge of natural hazards
Unit 2
The living world
Unit 3
Physical landscapes in the UK
Unit 4
Geographical skills: OS maps
Avg
score:
–
Topics
done:
0/32

Protecting cold environments

Practise 24 exam-style questions on Protecting cold environments for AQA GCSE Geography (Paper 1). Write your answer as you would in the exam and get it marked in seconds against the mark scheme, point by point, with an AI tutor on hand if you get stuck.

  • 24 questions
  • 1–12 marks each
  • Instant marking
  • No sign-up needed
20 questions, marked as you go

Sample questions with model answers

Here are 4 of the questions in this topic, each with a model answer, an explanation of why it earns the marks and the mark scheme an examiner would use.

Question 1

1 mark

Which one of the following is an example of using technology to reduce the impact of development in a cold environment?

A Signing an international treaty that bans mining
B Building an oil pipeline on raised supports above the permafrost
C Creating a national park
D A conservation group running a public campaign

Give the letter of your answer.

Model answer

B

Explanation

The specification names four types of strategy: use of technology, the role of governments, international agreements and conservation groups. A raised pipeline is technology; a treaty is an international agreement, a national park is a government strategy and a campaign is the work of a conservation group.

Mark scheme
  1. 1 mark

    B (building an oil pipeline on raised supports above the permafrost)

    Accept the letter or the option written out; do not accept more than one answer.

Question 2

2 marks

Outline one way in which governments can protect cold environments.

Model answer

Governments can create protected areas such as national parks. About two-thirds of Svalbard is protected in national parks and nature reserves, so mining and other damaging development is not allowed there.

Explanation

Governments have the power to make and enforce laws, so they can protect land, control pollution and decide whether development goes ahead. A developed answer explains the effect of the action or gives a real example.

Mark scheme
  1. 1 mark

    Create national parks / wildlife refuges / protected areas / pass laws (e.g. on pollution) / require environmental impact assessments / ban or limit drilling and mining / set hunting or fishing quotas

    1 mark for the basic point, 1 for development or an example. Only one way is credited.

  2. 1 mark

    Development or example, e.g. development is restricted, so habitats are not damaged (e.g. the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge; about two-thirds of Svalbard is protected) / the USA required double-hulled oil tankers after the Exxon Valdez spill, reducing the risk of spills / Greenland stopped issuing new oil exploration licences in 2021

Question 3

4 marks

Explain how technology can reduce the environmental impact of oil extraction in cold environments.

Model answer

Directional drilling allows many wells to be drilled at different angles from a single small pad, so far less tundra is cleared than when each well needed its own site. In winter, oil companies build ice roads and ice pads, which melt away in spring and leave little trace on the fragile vegetation. Pipelines such as the Trans-Alaska Pipeline are raised on supports, some fitted with heat pipes, so the permafrost stays frozen and caribou can pass underneath, and the zigzag design lets the pipe move during earthquakes without breaking. Leak detection systems and shut-off valves limit the size of any spill, and since the Exxon Valdez disaster, oil tankers in the USA have had to have double hulls, reducing the risk of oil leaking into the sea.

Explanation

Each technology should be linked to the impact it reduces: smaller footprint, protection of permafrost and vegetation, wildlife migration, or fewer spills. Level 2 needs at least two clearly explained examples. A list of technologies without explanation stays in Level 1.

Mark scheme
  1. 4 marks

    Levels of response (4 marks).
    Level 2 (3-4 marks): clear explanation of two or more technologies, each linked to the environmental impact it reduces; may use examples.
    Level 1 (1-2 marks): basic description of technologies with little explanation of how they reduce impacts.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): directional drilling allows many wells to be drilled from one small pad, reducing the area of tundra disturbed; drilling pads are much smaller than in the past; ice roads and ice pads used in winter melt in spring, leaving little trace on the tundra; vehicles with low-pressure tyres reduce damage to vegetation; pipelines raised on supports protect the permafrost and allow caribou to migrate; heat pipes (thermosiphons) keep the ground frozen; zigzag pipelines flex in earthquakes and temperature changes, reducing the risk of breaks; leak detection systems and shut-off valves limit the size of spills; double-hulled tankers (required in the USA after the Exxon Valdez spill) reduce the risk of spills at sea; satellites monitor ice, wildlife and leaks.

Question 4

9 marks

'The Antarctic Treaty has been successful in protecting Antarctica.'

To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Model answer

I largely agree that the Antarctic Treaty has been successful in protecting Antarctica from direct human damage, but it cannot protect the continent from every threat.

The Treaty, signed in 1959 by 12 countries and now joined by more than 50, has achieved a great deal. Antarctica has remained free of military conflict, and because territorial claims were frozen, no country has been able to exploit the continent's resources for itself. Nuclear explosions and the dumping of radioactive waste are banned. The Treaty has also encouraged international scientific cooperation, leading to discoveries such as the ozone hole in 1985 and ice-core records of past climates.

The agreements linked to the Treaty have strengthened this protection. The Madrid Protocol, signed in 1991, banned mining and made Antarctica a natural reserve devoted to peace and science. All activities now need an environmental impact assessment, and waste must be removed from the continent. CCAMLR sets limits on fishing for krill and toothfish, and in 2016 its members agreed to create a huge marine protected area in the Ross Sea. As a result, Antarctica remains the least developed continent on Earth.

However, there are important limitations. Tourism has grown rapidly and is largely self-regulated by the tour operators' association, IAATO, rather than by binding laws. Research stations themselves have impacts through fuel use, waste and buildings. Fishing for krill is increasing, and because decisions require the agreement of every member, proposals for new marine protected areas have been blocked for years. The mining ban could be reviewed from 2048, when pressure for resources may be greater. Most importantly, the Treaty cannot stop climate change, which is causing ice shelves such as Larsen B to collapse and affecting krill and penguin populations.

Overall, I agree to a large extent. The Treaty has been remarkably successful at preventing the military use, mining and uncontrolled exploitation that have damaged other regions, which is why Antarctica is still a wilderness. But its success is limited by its reliance on consensus and voluntary rules for tourism, and it has no power over global climate change, which is now the greatest threat to Antarctica.

Explanation

Level 3 answers evaluate both what the Treaty system has achieved (peace, science, the mining ban, fishing controls) and what it has not (tourism, consensus problems, climate change), and reach a supported judgement such as 'successful against local threats but not global ones'. A description of the Treaty's rules without evaluation stays in Level 1 or 2.

Mark scheme
  1. 9 marks

    Levels of response (9 marks).
    Level 3 (7-9 marks): detailed, well-developed explanation of what the Antarctic Treaty (and the agreements linked to it) has achieved and of its limitations; thorough evaluation of its success; reaches a clear, substantiated judgement on the extent of agreement; accurate, specific detail.
    Level 2 (4-6 marks): clear explanation with some evaluation, which may be unbalanced; a judgement may be given but is only partly supported; some accurate detail.
    Level 1 (1-3 marks): basic description of the Treaty; little or no evaluation and no clear judgement.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): successes - signed in 1959 by 12 countries, now more than 50; no military conflict or military bases; territorial claims frozen, so no country exploits the continent; nuclear explosions and radioactive waste banned; international scientific cooperation (e.g. ice cores, discovery of the ozone hole in 1985); Madrid Protocol (signed 1991, in force 1998) bans mining, requires environmental impact assessments, controls waste - old waste has been removed from some bases; CCAMLR sets fishing limits; Ross Sea Marine Protected Area agreed in 2016; Antarctica remains the least developed continent. Limitations - tourism has grown rapidly and is largely self-regulated by IAATO; research stations have their own impacts (fuel, waste, buildings); fishing for krill is increasing and illegal fishing has occurred; decisions need consensus, so proposals for new marine protected areas have been blocked for years; the mining ban could be reviewed from 2048, and interest in resources may grow; the Treaty cannot stop climate change, which is causing ice shelves to collapse (e.g. Larsen B, 2002) and affecting krill and penguins; enforcement depends on member countries. Judgement required.

Ready to try the rest? Every answer you write is marked against the mark scheme, so you can see exactly where the marks are.

AI Tutor Hints first, answers after you try

Hi! Stuck? Ask me for a hint and I’ll help you work it out. Once you’ve checked your answer I can explain exactly where the marks are.