Question 1
2 marksFarmers add fertilisers containing nitrates and phosphates to fields from which crops are harvested every year. A natural woodland nearby is never fertilised, but its trees continue to grow well.
Explain why the fields need fertilisers but the woodland does not.
Model answer
When the crop is harvested, the nitrogen and phosphorus in its proteins, nucleic acids and other compounds are taken away from the field instead of being returned to the soil, so fertiliser is needed to replace the nitrates and phosphates removed. In the woodland, leaves and dead organisms fall to the ground and are decomposed by saprobionts, releasing ammonium, nitrate and phosphate ions back into the soil, so the nutrients are recycled.
Explanation
In natural ecosystems nutrients are recycled: saprobionts decompose dead material and return inorganic ions to the soil. Harvesting crops, or removing livestock, takes nitrogen and phosphorus out of the ecosystem, so farmers must replace them with natural fertilisers (manure, compost) or artificial fertilisers. It is wrong to say that trees do not need these ions.
Mark scheme
-
1 mark
Harvesting removes the crop, so the nitrogen/phosphorus compounds (e.g. proteins/nucleic acids) in it are removed from the field AND are not returned to the soil
Max 2. Accept 'the crop is not left to die and decompose in the field'. Accept 'removing livestock also removes these elements'.
-
1 mark
In the woodland, dead leaves/organisms and waste are decomposed by saprobionts, releasing ammonium/nitrate/phosphate ions back into the soil
Accept 'nutrients are recycled in the woodland'. Reject 'trees do not need nitrate or phosphate'.
-
1 mark
(So in the fields) nitrate/phosphate ions in the soil are used up and must be replaced to prevent them limiting growth