Question 1
2 marksA teacher planned a class investigation into the effect of pH on the rate of starch hydrolysis by amylase. Some students suggested using amylase from their own saliva. The teacher decided to use a commercial amylase solution of known concentration instead.
Suggest two reasons for the teacher's decision.
Model answer
1. The concentration of amylase in saliva differs between people and at different times, so the enzyme concentration would not be controlled and results from different groups could not be compared.
2. Saliva contains other substances, such as hydrogencarbonate ions, that could change the pH of the reaction mixture.
Explanation
A valid investigation of pH must keep enzyme concentration constant and change only the pH. Saliva is a variable mixture: its amylase concentration and its buffering ions differ from person to person, and handling other people's body fluids is a hygiene risk. A commercial enzyme of known concentration gives repeatable, comparable results.
Mark scheme
-
1 mark
The concentration/activity of amylase in saliva varies between people / at different times, so the enzyme concentration would not be controlled (or results could not be compared/repeated)
Max 2. One mark for each reason. List rule: if more than two reasons are given, each wrong or contradictory extra answer cancels one correct answer. Accept "you would not know how much amylase was in each sample".
-
1 mark
Saliva contains other substances that could affect the reaction or the pH, e.g. hydrogencarbonate ions/buffers, chloride ions, food particles, mucus or other enzymes
Accept "saliva has its own pH/buffers, so the pH of the buffer could be changed".
-
1 mark
Risk of infection / saliva (a body fluid) may contain pathogens that could be passed to others
Accept "hygiene risk when saliva samples are handled or spilled".
-
1 mark
Ethical reason: students may not want to give saliva / would need to give consent (and should not be pressured)
Ignore cost or time.