Question 1
6 marksNewborn calves have very few antibodies in their blood. They obtain antibodies from colostrum, the first milk produced by their mother. For a short time after birth, cells lining the calf's small intestine can absorb whole antibody molecules, but this ability decreases with time.
Farm scientists fed four groups of 12 newborn calves the same volume of colostrum at different times after birth. They measured the concentration of antibodies in each calf's blood 48 hours after birth. They also recorded how many calves in each group developed a gut infection during their first month. The table shows their results.
Calculate the percentage decrease in the mean concentration of antibodies when colostrum was fed at 24 hours compared with 1 hour. Give your answer to 2 significant figures.
Explain why the antibodies from colostrum give calves only short-term protection against infection.
A farmer concluded that feeding colostrum within 1 hour of birth prevents gut infections in calves. Evaluate this conclusion.
Model answer
Percentage decrease = (32 - 6) ÷ 32 × 100 = 26 ÷ 32 × 100 = 81.25 = 81%
This is passive immunity: the antibodies were made by the mother, not by the calf. The calf's own B cells are not activated, so no plasma cells or memory cells are produced, and the absorbed antibodies are broken down over time and are not replaced.
The data support a link: only 1 of the 12 calves fed at 1 hour developed an infection, compared with 7 of 12 fed at 24 hours, and the early-fed calves had the most antibodies. However, one early-fed calf still became infected, so early feeding reduces the risk rather than preventing infection, and the groups were small.
Explanation
Antibodies from colostrum (or across the placenta) give passive immunity: protection is immediate but short-lived, because no memory cells are made and the antibodies are gradually broken down. Percentage decrease is the change divided by the starting value (32). To evaluate 'prevents', look for any calf that was still infected and for the size of the groups. Antibodies only protect against antigens they are complementary to, so the mother's previous infections matter.
Mark scheme
-
1 mark
Correct method: (32 - 6) ÷ 32 × 100; or a correct final answer of 81 with no working
Max 6. Points 1 and 2 are the calculation: a correct answer of 81 (%) with no working scores 2 marks. Accept for 1 mark: 81.25 or 81.3 (not 2 significant figures) OR 0.81 (not multiplied by 100) OR 430 / 433 (the difference divided by 6).
-
1 mark
81 (%)
-
1 mark
This is passive immunity: the antibodies were not made by the calf
Points 3 to 5: max 2.
-
1 mark
The calf's B cells are not activated / there is no clonal selection, so no memory cells are made
Reject 'memory cells die'.
-
1 mark
The antibodies are broken down / hydrolysed over time and are not replaced
-
1 mark
(Supports) the fewest calves developed an infection when fed at 1 hour (1 of 12, compared with 7 of 12 at 24 hours) and they had the most antibodies (32 g dm⁻³)
Points 6 to 11: max 2, with at most 1 mark from point 6 (for the conclusion) and at most 1 mark from points 7 to 11 (against it).
-
1 mark
(Against) one calf fed at 1 hour still developed an infection, so early feeding reduces the risk but does not prevent infection
-
1 mark
(Against) the groups were small (12 calves) / only one trial
-
1 mark
(Against) the colostrum may not contain antibodies against every pathogen that causes gut infections / protection depends on which pathogens the mother has met
-
1 mark
(Against) other factors that affect infection may differ between the groups, e.g. hygiene, the calves' health or birth mass, the antibody content of the colostrum / the calves were not allocated to the groups at random
Accept 'correlation does not show causation' only if it is linked to other factors.
-
1 mark
(Against) no statistical test was used, so the difference in the number of infections may be due to chance
Reject 'the results are due to chance'.