Question 1
2 marksA cyclist and her bicycle are modelled as a particle when her motion along a straight road is analysed.
Sam says, "Modelling the cyclist and her bicycle as a particle means that their mass is ignored."
Explain why Sam is wrong, and state what the particle model does ignore.
Model answer
Sam is wrong: a particle has mass. In the model the whole mass of the cyclist and bicycle is concentrated at a single point, and this mass is still used, for example in F = ma.
What the particle model ignores is the size (the dimensions and shape) of the cyclist and bicycle, so effects such as rotation of the wheels, or how the rider's shape affects air resistance, are not included.
Explanation
A particle is an object whose mass is concentrated at a single point, so its mass is kept but its dimensions are ignored. This lets us treat all the forces as acting at one point and ignore rotation. Examiners' reports note that students lose marks by saying that a particle model ignores mass or weight.
Mark scheme
-
1 mark
B1 Sam is wrong because a particle still has mass: the whole mass of the cyclist and bicycle is taken to be concentrated at a single point (and it is used, e.g. in F = ma)
Needs the idea that the mass is kept (concentrated at a point). B0 for "Sam is wrong" with no reason.
-
1 mark
B1 The particle model ignores the size, shape and dimensions of the cyclist and bicycle (so, for example, rotation of the wheels and the effect of the rider's shape on air resistance are ignored)
Accept "dimensions", "size" or "shape". B0 if mass or weight is said to be ignored. Examiners' reports note that "the particle has no mass" is a common wrong answer.