Source A: Ovid, The Art of Love (Ars Amatoria) 1 (Ovid tells the story of the Sabine women as an example of how to find a girlfriend at the theatre)
'In the middle of the applause the king gave the people the signal to seize their prey. At once they leap up, revealing their intentions by their shouts, and lay eager hands on the girls. As doves, the most timid of flocks, flee from eagles, and as a new-born lamb flees from the wolves it sees, so the girls feared the men rushing at them wildly... Some tear their hair, some sit senseless; one is silent in grief, another calls in vain for her mother. The captured girls are led away, a prize for the marriage-bed, and fear itself made many of them look more beautiful. If any fought back too hard and refused her partner, the man lifted her up himself in his eager arms and said: "Why spoil your tender eyes with tears? What your father is to your mother, I will be to you." Romulus, you alone knew how to give your soldiers rewards: give me rewards like these, and I will be a soldier.'
To what extent do Roman writers present the seizure of the Sabine women as justified? Use Source A as a starting point and your own knowledge.
Model answer
Roman writers generally present the seizure of the Sabine women as justified, or at least excusable, but their accounts also reveal how violent it was. Livy offers the fullest justification. Rome had a shortage of women and its greatness would last only one generation; the neighbours refused intermarriage with insults, so Romulus' plan at the games for Neptune Equester seems a necessity. Romulus blames the fathers' pride and promises the women lawful marriage, a share in property and citizenship, and children, and the story ends in peace and the union of two peoples, with the curiae named after the women. The wedding cry 'Talassio' links every Roman marriage to this founding story. In Source A, Ovid's Roman also promises a resisting girl 'What your father is to your mother, I will be to you', suggesting marriage, not mere violence.
Yet both writers show the crime clearly. Livy lets the parents accuse the Romans of breaking the bond of hospitality and deceiving them with religion. Ovid's similes are even more revealing: the men are eagles and wolves, the girls timid doves and a new-born lamb, and the women tear their hair, sit senseless or call 'in vain' for their mothers. The men seize their 'prey' with 'eager hands', and fear is said to make the girls 'more beautiful'. Ovid's tone is joking: he ends by saying he would gladly be a soldier for 'rewards like these'. This makes the women's terror into entertainment; it may be callous, or it may be ironic, mocking the solemn version of Rome's origins that Augustus promoted.
Overall, Livy works hard to justify the seizure as necessary and beneficial, while Ovid treats it as a light-hearted example for lovers; but neither hides the violence, and Ovid's images in particular allow readers to see the women as victims of a crime that the story's happy ending cannot fully excuse.
Explanation
The best answers compare Livy's justifying narrative with Ovid's playful tone and analyse Ovid's language (prey, eagles, wolves, 'more beautiful') to show the violence beneath the humour. A judgement that distinguishes the writers' purposes is a strong substantiated conclusion.