Level:
Correct: 0
Incorrect: 0
Marks: 0/0
Exam Practice
Subject:
Topics:
OCR GCSE Classical Civilisation (Women in the Ancient World) Smart practice A mixed round aimed at your weak spots
Unit 1
Greece
Unit 2
Rome
Unit 3
Greece and Rome
Avg
score:
–
Topics
done:
0/21

'Improper' women in Greece: pornai, hetairai, Neaira and Aspasia

Practise 30 exam-style questions on 'Improper' women in Greece: pornai, hetairai, Neaira and Aspasia for OCR GCSE Classical Civilisation (Women in the Ancient World). Write your answer as you would in the exam and get it marked in seconds against the mark scheme, point by point, with an AI tutor on hand if you get stuck.

  • 30 questions
  • 1–8 marks each
  • Instant marking
  • No sign-up needed
20 questions, marked as you go

Sample questions with model answers

Here are 4 of the questions in this topic, each with a model answer, an explanation of why it earns the marks and the mark scheme an examiner would use.

Question 1

1 mark

The speech Against Neaira (about 340 BC) has come down to us among the speeches of Demosthenes, but most of it was delivered by an Athenian who had a long-running feud with Neaira's partner Stephanos; his relative Theomnestos spoke first. Name the man who delivered most of the speech.

Model answer

Apollodoros, the son of the banker Pasion.

Explanation

Apollodoros, son of the rich banker Pasion (a former slave who had been made a citizen), took up the case to get revenge on Stephanos, who had earlier prosecuted him and tried to have him fined 15 talents. Most scholars think Apollodoros wrote the speech himself, which is why it is listed as '[Demosthenes] 59'. Knowing the prosecutor's personal motive matters when judging how reliable the speech is.

Mark scheme
  1. 1 mark

    Apollodoros (son of Pasion)

    Accept Apollodorus. Do not accept Demosthenes, Theomnestos or Stephanos.

Question 2

2 marks

Source A: The Constitution of the Athenians 50.2 (written by Aristotle or one of his students, 4th century BC)

'The city controllers (astynomoi) ... see that the girls who play the aulos, the harp and the lyre are not hired out for more than two drachmas, and if more than one man wants to take the same girl, they cast lots and hire her out to the winner.'

Give one detail from Source A about how the state controlled the hiring of these entertainers, and suggest one reason why it did so.

Model answer

Officials called astynomoi made sure that the girls were not hired for more than two drachmas. The state probably did this to stop rival men fighting over the most popular girls, which could lead to disorder in the city.

Explanation

The Constitution of the Athenians shows that the Athenian state treated the hiring of female entertainers as something to be officially regulated, like other trade in the city. That girls could be 'hired out' and allotted by drawing lots shows they were treated as commodities; many were slaves. Keeping order and fair prices are both sensible reasons; credit any reason that fits the source.

Mark scheme
  1. 1 mark

    A detail from Source A of how the hiring was controlled.

    One from: a maximum fee of two drachmas; officials (the astynomoi / city controllers) supervised them; if several men wanted the same girl, lots were drawn and she was hired to the winner.

  2. 1 mark

    A valid suggested reason why the state controlled the hiring.

    E.g.: to prevent fights / violence between rival men wanting the same girl; to keep public order in the city; to keep prices fair / stop owners charging too much; because the girls were seen as goods or a service to be regulated like anything else sold in the city. Credit any sensible reason.

Question 3

3 marks

Source A: Isaeus 3 (On the Estate of Pyrrhus) 13-14. The speaker argues that a woman who lived with Pyrrhus was a hetaira, not his wife.

'The witnesses say that, while she lived with him, there were fights over her, serenades at her door and a great deal of rowdy behaviour. Yet surely no one would dare to go serenading to the house of a married woman. And married women do not go with their husbands to dinners, nor do they think it right to dine in the company of outsiders, least of all with anyone who happens to come along.'

Using Source A and your own knowledge, explain why respectable Athenian wives did not attend symposia.

Model answer

Source A shows that respectable wives did not dine with 'outsiders' - men outside their family - and that a woman who did was assumed to be a hetaira, the kind of woman men fought over and serenaded at her door. A wife's reputation for chastity was essential, because it guaranteed that her children were legitimate heirs and citizens. Symposia involved heavy drinking, games like kottabos and sexual entertainment by hetairai and aulos-girls, so a wife who attended would be treated as one of them; instead she stayed in the women's quarters.

Explanation

Isaeus' argument works only because everyone on the jury agreed that wives did not attend dinners with outsiders: a woman's presence at such events was itself evidence that she was not a wife. This shows how the boundary between 'proper' and 'improper' women was defined by where they went and who saw them. Good answers combine a point from the source with own knowledge.

Mark scheme
  1. 3 marks

    Explanation of why respectable wives did not attend symposia: 1 mark for each valid point or development, max 3. Maximum 2 marks if the answer uses only Source A or only own knowledge.

    From Source A: married women did not dine with outsiders / men outside the family; fights, serenades and rowdy behaviour were associated with hetairai, not wives; attending dinners would itself suggest that a woman was a hetaira. Own knowledge: the ideal of seclusion in the women's quarters (gynaikon); a wife's chastity guaranteed legitimate children and heirs (citizenship law); symposia involved heavy drinking, sex, hetairai, aulos-girls and games like kottabos; the andron was near the street door to keep guests away from the women; Plato's Symposium sends the aulos-girl to 'the women inside'; the ideal was to be 'least talked about among men' (Thucydides).

Question 4

8 marks

Source A: Plutarch, Pericles 24

'Pericles' own wife was a close relative of his, and had been married before to Hipponicus, by whom she had Callias the Rich; with Pericles she had Xanthippus and Paralus. Later, since they did not get on together, he handed her over to another husband with her consent, and took Aspasia himself and loved her deeply. They say that every day, when he went out and when he came back from the agora, he greeted her with a kiss. ... It seems that he also had an illegitimate son by her.'

To what extent was Aspasia treated more like a wife than a hetaira? Use Source A as a starting point and your own knowledge.

Model answer

In private, Pericles seems to have treated Aspasia very much as a wife. Source A says that after an unhappy marriage he handed his wife to another husband and 'took Aspasia himself and loved her deeply', greeting her with a kiss every time he left and returned home. They lived together for years and had a son, Pericles the Younger, whom Pericles clearly wanted as his heir, since he later asked the Athenians to make the boy a citizen after his legitimate sons Xanthippus and Paralus died in the plague.

However, in law and in public opinion Aspasia was not a wife. She came from Miletus, and Pericles' own citizenship law of 451/450 BC meant that a metic could not marry a citizen or bear citizen children; her son was a nothos until a special exception was made. Comic poets made the point cruelly: Cratinus called her a 'dog-eyed concubine' and others the 'new Omphale', a foreign woman who enslaved a great man. Plutarch reports that she was said to imitate the Ionian courtesan Thargelia and to keep young hetairai, and the comic poet Hermippus prosecuted her for impiety. Her life was also unlike a wife's because it was so public: Socrates and his friends visited her to hear her talk, whereas a respectable wife was expected to be unseen.

We should be cautious, though, because much of this comes from comedy written to mock Pericles, and Plutarch was writing about five hundred years later; even he reports many things only as 'they say'.

Overall, Aspasia was treated as a wife by Pericles himself, but Athenian law and society never let her be one. She fitted neither category neatly: a long-term partner with a wife's affection but a hetaira's public reputation.

Explanation

The best answers weigh Pericles' private treatment of Aspasia against her legal status and public reputation, and show why the citizenship law mattered. Evaluating the sources (comedy written to attack Pericles, Plutarch's distance in time) adds critical analysis. A narrative of Aspasia's life without a judgement on 'wife or hetaira' cannot reach the top levels.

Mark scheme
  1. 8 marks

    Levels of response (8 marks). AO1 (4) and AO2 (4) are equally weighted.
    Level 4 (7-8 marks): consistently accurate and detailed knowledge of Aspasia and her relationship with Pericles, using both Source A and own wider knowledge; very good understanding of the cultural context (citizenship law, the roles of wives and hetairai) and possible interpretations; a well-argued response with a clear, substantiated judgement on how far Aspasia was treated like a wife rather than a hetaira, supported by a range of well-selected evidence, including critical analysis of the sources.
    Level 3 (5-6 marks): accurate knowledge, using both the source and own knowledge; a focused response with relevant analysis of Aspasia's position and a judgement.
    Level 2 (3-4 marks): sound, mostly accurate knowledge; engages with the general topic of Aspasia; limited range of evidence, some analysis.
    Level 1 (1-2 marks): limited knowledge, may only use the source given; isolated analysis.
    0 marks: no response or no response worthy of credit.
    A mainly descriptive answer with little analysis or judgement cannot go above Level 2.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): AO1: Source A - Pericles handed his wife (mother of Xanthippus and Paralus) to another husband and took Aspasia, loving her deeply, kissing her each time he left and returned; a son by her (Pericles the Younger); Aspasia from Miletus, daughter of Axiochos, a metic, so unable to marry Pericles under his own citizenship law of 451/450 BC; the son a nothos, made a citizen only by special exception after the plague; Plutarch: said to imitate the Ionian courtesan Thargelia, valued for wisdom and political understanding, Socrates and friends visited, men brought wives to hear her, accused of keeping young hetairai; comic poets: the new Omphale, Deianira, Hera, Cratinus' 'dog-eyed concubine'; Hermippus' prosecution for impiety, Pericles weeping in court (Pericles 32); after Pericles' death she lived with Lysicles; Plato's Menexenus: a teacher of rhetoric. AO2: like a wife - a long, faithful, loving partnership in Pericles' household; she bore him a son he wanted to be his heir; the Hera joke implies she was seen as his consort. Like a hetaira - she could not legally be a wife; she was foreign and allegedly ran a house of hetairai; she mixed with men and was famous for conversation, unlike a secluded wife; comedians called her a concubine. Evaluation of sources: Plutarch writes about 500 years later using hostile comedy; comic insults aimed at Pericles. Judgement: e.g. Pericles treated her as a wife in private, but law and public opinion treated her as a hetaira or concubine - she fitted neither category.

Ready to try the rest? Every answer you write is marked against the mark scheme, so you can see exactly where the marks are.

AI Tutor Hints first, answers after you try

Hi! Stuck? Ask me for a hint and I’ll help you work it out. Once you’ve checked your answer I can explain exactly where the marks are.