Has the role of the individual been the main factor in progress in the treatment of disease in Britain?
Explain your answer with reference to the role of the individual and other factors. Use a range of examples from across your study of Health and the people: c1000 to the present day.
[16 marks] [SPaG 4 marks]
Model answer
Individuals have played a vital role in the treatment of disease, both in encouraging and in holding back progress. However, I will argue that individuals were rarely the main factor on their own: their ideas only led to progress when science and technology, government, war and communication allowed them to.
The influence of one individual is clearest in the Middle Ages, but it slowed progress. Galen's theory of the four humours and his idea of treating illness with opposites dominated medicine for more than a thousand years. Physicians trained at universities learned his books, and because his belief in a creator fitted Christian teaching, the Church supported his ideas. As a result, medieval doctors continued to bleed and purge patients, and no one seriously challenged him. Even when Vesalius showed in 1543 that Galen's anatomy contained errors, and Harvey proved in 1628 that the blood circulates, treatment hardly changed, because individuals alone could not overturn established ideas.
From the eighteenth century, individuals began to make real breakthroughs. Edward Jenner noticed that milkmaids who caught cowpox did not catch smallpox, tested his idea on James Phipps in 1796 and published his results in 1798. In the nineteenth century Louis Pasteur proved germ theory in 1861, and Robert Koch identified the bacteria that cause TB and cholera. Paul Ehrlich's Salvarsan 606 of 1909 was the first magic bullet, and in 1928 Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin. Without these individuals' insight and determination, these advances might have come much later.
However, almost all of them depended on other factors. Jenner's vaccine only reached the whole population because Parliament gave him grants of 10,000 pounds in 1802 and 20,000 pounds in 1807 and made vaccination compulsory in 1853. Pasteur and Koch relied on improved microscopes and on government funding encouraged by rivalry between France and Germany; both led teams, and it was Pasteur's assistant Chamberland whose mistake revealed weakened vaccines. Fleming's discovery was partly chance and he could not develop it. It took Florey, Chain and Heatley's team at Oxford, then the Second World War and American government money, to mass-produce penicillin. Fleming's paper was only noticed because Chain read it, which shows the importance of communication.
In the modern period the role of lone individuals has become smaller still. New drugs are developed by large teams in pharmaceutical companies, tested under government regulation introduced after thalidomide, and paid for by the NHS, created by Aneurin Bevan in 1948 but funded by the state. The COVID-19 vaccines of 2020 were the work of large teams, backed by billions of pounds of government money.
In conclusion, individuals have been very important: they provided the ideas behind almost every major breakthrough, and Galen's influence shows that they could also block progress. But they were not the main factor, because their ideas only led to better treatment when science and technology made them possible and government, war and industry provided the money and organisation to use them. The most important developments, such as penicillin, came when individuals and these factors worked together.
Explanation
Individuals such as Jenner, Pasteur, Koch, Fleming, Florey and Chain made breakthroughs, while Galen's authority shows individuals could also inhibit change. A Level 4 essay weighs individuals against science and technology, government, war, chance and communication across the whole period and reaches a sustained judgement; SPaG is marked separately.