Source A: Plutarch, Life of Antony 66 (Plutarch calls Octavian 'Caesar')
'Although the ships came to close quarters, they did not ram or smash one another. Antony's ships were too heavy to build up the speed which gives a ram its force, while Caesar's ships avoided charging head-on into their bronze-armoured bows, and did not dare to strike them in the side either, because their rams would easily have snapped off against hulls made of huge square timbers bolted together with iron. So the fighting was like a battle on land, or rather like the storming of a fortified town: three or four of Caesar's ships clustered round each of Antony's, and the men fought with wicker shields, spears, poles and fire-arrows, while Antony's men shot back with catapults from wooden towers.'
What does Source A suggest about the fighting at Actium? Make two points.
Model answer
Source A suggests that the battle was not a normal sea battle of ramming, but more like a siege: Plutarch says it was 'like the storming of a fortified town'. It also suggests that Octavian's side won by using its numbers and lighter ships to surround Antony's huge ones, since 'three or four of Caesar's ships clustered round each of Antony's'.
Explanation
Plutarch's account explains why the size of Antony's ships did not bring victory: they were too heavy to ram and could be surrounded, while their strong hulls made ramming them pointless. Good answers pick a clear point and support it with a short, precise quotation.