Figure 1 is a plan of the start of the fighting off Plymouth in July 1588. Dates are in the English calendar of 1588.
'The defeat of the Spanish Armada was mainly due to the skill of the English commanders.'
How far does a study of the Spanish Armada support this statement? Explain your answer.
You should refer to the Spanish Armada and your contextual knowledge.
Model answer
The English commanders - Lord Howard of Effingham, with Drake, Hawkins and Frobisher - played an important part in defeating the Armada, especially in the decisions that broke it up at Calais. However, a study of the campaign suggests that their skill worked alongside the advantages of English ships, serious Spanish weaknesses and the weather, which caused most of the Spanish losses.
There is good evidence of the commanders' skill. As Figure 1 shows, when the Armada was sighted off the Lizard on 19 July the English fleet was in Plymouth, but it worked its way out of the harbour and got to windward of the Armada. This gave the English the advantage for the rest of the campaign, because they could choose when and where to fight and the Spanish could never force them to close and board. Howard kept the fleet together, consulted his council of war, and after the fight off Portland divided the fleet into four squadrons under himself, Drake, Hawkins and Frobisher. Off the Isle of Wight the English pushed the Armada away from the Solent, so it could not shelter there. Above all, the commanders took the key decision to send eight fireships into the anchored Armada at Calais on the night of 28 July. The Spanish cut their cables and scattered, and the next day at Gravelines the English closed in and attacked at close range, sinking or wrecking several ships. These were skilful decisions that turned the campaign.
However, their skill had limits. For a week the English attacked the Armada at long range but did little damage, and only two Spanish ships were lost before Calais, both by accident. Drake's decision to leave his place at the head of the fleet to capture the Rosario caused confusion. The English ran short of powder and shot, partly because Elizabeth was reluctant to spend money, and even at Gravelines they could not destroy the Armada.
Other factors were also crucial. The English ships, rebuilt by Hawkins, were faster and better armed than the Spanish ones. The Spanish had serious weaknesses. Philip's plan depended on joining the Duke of Parma's army, but there was no deep-water port, Parma was not ready, and Dutch flyboats blockaded his barges. Medina Sidonia had little naval experience and was bound by Philip's orders, and the fleet was badly supplied after Drake's raid on Cadiz. Finally, the weather played a huge part: after Gravelines the wind drove the Armada away from the Zeeland banks into the North Sea, and on the way home round Scotland and Ireland storms wrecked far more ships than the English had sunk.
These factors were connected. The commanders' skill only worked because they had fast, well-armed ships, and the fireship attack was possible because Philip's plan had left the Armada waiting off Calais. Overall, a study of the Armada supports the statement only partly. The commanders' skill was the main reason why the invasion failed, because it stopped the Armada joining Parma, but the destruction of the Armada was due much more to Spanish weaknesses and the weather.
Explanation
The commanders got to windward off Plymouth, kept the fleet together, used fireships at Calais and attacked at Gravelines, but they did little damage before Calais and ran short of ammunition; English ships, Philip's plan, Parma's absence and the weather were also vital. Level 4 explains several factors, shows how they interacted and sustains a judgement, for example separating the failure of the invasion from the destruction of the fleet.