Question 1
2 marks\[\mathrm{f}(x) = x^3 - 3x^2 + 4\]
Show that \(\mathrm{f}(2) = 0\).
Explain why a change of sign method cannot be used to locate the root of \(\mathrm{f}(x) = 0\) at \(x = 2\).
Model answer
\(\mathrm{f}(2) = 2^3 - 3(2^2) + 4 = 8 - 12 + 4 = 0\)
Since \(\mathrm{f}(2) = 0\), \((x - 2)\) is a factor: \(\mathrm{f}(x) = (x - 2)^2(x + 1)\).
So \(x = 2\) is a repeated root: the curve \(y = \mathrm{f}(x)\) touches the x-axis at \(x = 2\) (a minimum point) and \(\mathrm{f}(x) \geqslant 0\) on both sides of it. There is no change of sign, so a change of sign method cannot locate this root.
Explanation
A change of sign method only finds roots where the curve crosses the x-axis. At a repeated root such as \(x = 2\) here, the curve touches the axis at a turning point, so \(\mathrm{f}(x)\) has the same sign on both sides. A common wrong reason is that the function is not continuous; it is a polynomial, so it is continuous everywhere.
Mark scheme
-
1 mark
B1 \(\mathrm{f}(2) = 8 - 12 + 4 = 0\)
The substitution must be seen.
-
1 mark
B1 \(\mathrm{f}(x) = (x - 2)^2(x + 1)\), so \(x = 2\) is a repeated root: \(\mathrm{f}(x) \geqslant 0\) on both sides of \(x = 2\) (the curve touches the x-axis at a minimum point), so there is no change of sign
Accept a numerical demonstration with a reason, e.g. \(\mathrm{f}(1.9) = 0.029\) and \(\mathrm{f}(2.1) = 0.031\) are both positive because the curve touches the x-axis at \(x = 2\). Accept "the x-axis is a tangent to the curve at \(x = 2\)". Do not accept "\(\mathrm{f}\) is not continuous".