Source A: Homer, Odyssey 22. Odysseus has revealed himself to the suitors. Eurymachus answers him.
'If you really are Odysseus of Ithaca come home, what you say is right: the Achaeans have done many reckless things in your halls and many on your farms. But the man who was to blame for everything already lies dead, Antinous. He was the one who started all this, not so much because he wanted or needed the marriage, but because he had other plans, which the son of Cronus did not let him achieve: to be king himself over the people of Ithaca, and to ambush and kill your son. Now he has been killed, as he deserved; so spare your own people. We will make amends to you afterwards from the whole land for all that has been eaten and drunk in your halls, each of us bringing the value of twenty oxen, and we will pay back bronze and gold until your heart is softened.'
To what extent are the suitors presented as deserving their deaths in Books 21 and 22? Use Source A as a starting point and your own knowledge.
Model answer
Source A is revealing. Eurymachus admits that 'the Achaeans have done many reckless things' in Odysseus' halls and on his farms, and he reveals that Antinous wanted to be king and planned 'to ambush and kill your son'. His offer of compensation, twenty oxen' worth from each suitor plus bronze and gold, is an admission of guilt; but it comes only when the suitors are trapped, and he shifts all the blame onto the dead Antinous, which makes him seem cowardly and self-serving.
The rest of Books 21 and 22 strengthens the case against them. Penelope accuses them of eating and drinking 'without end' while Odysseus is away. Antinous insults the loyal herdsmen and threatens the beggar, breaking the rules of xenia, and the suitors jeer at Eumaeus as he carries the bow. When Odysseus reveals himself, he lists their crimes: wasting his house, forcing the slave women to sleep with them and courting his wife while he was alive, with no fear of the gods. Even after Eurymachus' offer, the suitors choose to fight, and Melanthius arms them. Odysseus later tells Eurycleia that they were destroyed by the gods' fate and their own wicked deeds, and Athena's help and Zeus' thunder show divine approval.
However, not all the suitors are equally guilty. Leodes hated their reckless deeds and claims he tried to restrain them, yet he is beheaded; Amphinomus, the most decent of them, is killed too. In Homeric society compensation was an accepted way of settling wrongs, so Odysseus' refusal may seem excessive, and a modern audience may feel that death is too harsh for eating someone's food. Overall, as a group the suitors are clearly presented as deserving death for their hubris, their abuse of xenia and their plot against Telemachus, but Homer allows us some doubt about individuals such as Leodes and Amphinomus.
Explanation
The question of justice is central to Books 21 and 22. A top answer uses Eurymachus' speech (his admission, his blame of Antinous and his offer) together with a range of other evidence, considers Homeric values such as xenia and compensation, and distinguishes between guilty leaders and more sympathetic suitors before reaching a judgement. Narrative answers stay in Level 2.