Level:
Correct: 0
Incorrect: 0
Marks: 0/0
Exam Practice
Subject:
Topics:
AQA GCSE History (Conflict and tension 1945-1972) Smart practice A mixed round aimed at your weak spots
Unit 1
Part one: The origins of the Cold War
Unit 2
Part two: The development of the Cold War
Unit 3
Part three: Transformation of the Cold War
Avg
score:
–
Topics
done:
0/9

Berlin Wall

Practise 46 exam-style questions on Berlin Wall for AQA GCSE History (Conflict and tension 1945-1972). Write your answer as you would in the exam and get it marked in seconds against the mark scheme, point by point, with an AI tutor on hand if you get stuck.

  • 46 questions
  • 1–20 marks each
  • Instant marking
  • No sign-up needed
20 questions, marked as you go

Sample questions with model answers

Here are 4 of the questions in this topic, each with a model answer, an explanation of why it earns the marks and the mark scheme an examiner would use.

Question 1

2 marks

Describe two ways in which President Kennedy responded to the building of the Berlin Wall in August 1961.

Model answer

First, Kennedy did not try to knock the Wall down, because it did not threaten the Western presence in West Berlin and he wanted to avoid war. Second, he sent Vice-President Johnson and about 1,500 extra US troops to West Berlin to show that the USA would still defend the city.

Explanation

Kennedy accepted the Wall as a better outcome than war, but took visible steps to reassure West Berliners: Johnson's visit, extra troops and General Clay. He also kept up the military build-up he had announced in July 1961.

Mark scheme
  1. 2 marks

    Two ways, 1 mark each: he accepted the Wall and took no military action to knock it down, because it did not threaten Western rights in West Berlin / he sent Vice-President Lyndon Johnson to West Berlin (19 August) to reassure West Berliners / he sent about 1,500 extra US troops along the autobahn from West Germany to West Berlin (20 August) / he sent General Lucius Clay, hero of the Berlin Airlift, to Berlin, later as his personal representative / the Western Allies sent formal protests to the USSR / he continued the military build-up announced in July 1961 (reservists called up, more defence spending) / he insisted Western access to West Berlin and Allied rights to enter East Berlin must continue.

    Max 2. Credit any two different valid ways. Accept 'he did nothing at first / made no public statement for several days' as one way.

Question 2

4 marks

Source A: from a television address by President Kennedy to the American people on 25 July 1961.
'We cannot and will not permit the Communists to drive us out of Berlin, either gradually or by force... We do not want to fight - but we have fought before.'

Source A opposes Soviet demands over Berlin. How do you know?

Explain your answer by referring to Source A and your contextual knowledge.

Model answer

Source A opposes Soviet demands because Kennedy says that the USA 'cannot and will not permit the Communists to drive us out of Berlin'. Since 1958 Khrushchev had demanded that Western troops leave West Berlin and that it become a demilitarised 'free city', and at the Vienna Summit in June 1961 he had threatened to sign a separate peace treaty with East Germany by the end of the year, which would hand the GDR control of the routes into West Berlin. Kennedy's words 'either gradually or by force' show that he would resist both slow pressure and an attack. 'We have fought before' is a clear warning that the USA was ready to go to war over Berlin. The provenance supports this: it was a television address in July 1961 in which Kennedy also announced a military build-up, with billions of dollars more for defence, more troops and reservists called up. It was aimed at Khrushchev as much as at Americans, to show the toughness he was thought to lack after the Bay of Pigs.

Explanation

Level 2 links Kennedy's words to the specific Soviet demands (the 1958 ultimatum renewed at Vienna) and to the military build-up announced in the same speech. Considering who the speech was really aimed at develops the analysis of provenance.

Mark scheme
  1. 4 marks

    Levels of response (4 marks).
    Level 2 (3-4 marks): Developed analysis of Source A: explains how the content (e.g. the refusal to be driven out 'gradually or by force', the warning 'we have fought before') and/or the provenance (the President on national television in July 1961, after the Vienna Summit) show opposition to Soviet demands, supported by relevant contextual knowledge (e.g. Khrushchev's demand at Vienna for a peace treaty with East Germany and a 'free city' of West Berlin by the end of 1961; Kennedy's military build-up).
    Level 1 (1-2 marks): Simple analysis of Source A: identifies a relevant feature, e.g. 'he says the USA will not be driven out of Berlin', with little or no supporting knowledge.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): Kennedy refuses to leave Berlin - Khrushchev had demanded since 1958 that Western troops leave and West Berlin become a 'free city'; 'gradually or by force' shows he would resist both pressure and attack; 'we have fought before' is a warning that the USA was ready to go to war, recalling the Second World War and Korea; context - at the Vienna Summit (June 1961) Khrushchev renewed his ultimatum, threatening to sign a separate peace treaty with East Germany by the end of 1961, which would give the GDR control of access to West Berlin; in this speech Kennedy announced a military build-up: about 3.2 billion dollars more for defence, a larger army, more draftees, reservists called up and a fallout shelter programme; his 'three essentials' were the Western presence in West Berlin, access to it and the freedom of its people; provenance - the President speaking to the American people on national television, also aimed at Khrushchev; it was meant to show the toughness he was accused of lacking after the Bay of Pigs and Vienna.

Question 3

8 marks

Write an account of how the division of Berlin after the Second World War led to the building of the Berlin Wall in 1961.

Model answer

At the end of the Second World War the Allies agreed, at Yalta and Potsdam in 1945, to divide Germany into four zones of occupation. Berlin, which lay about 160 km inside the Soviet zone, was also divided into four sectors. This meant that the Western powers had troops and rights in a city surrounded by Soviet-controlled territory.

The division soon caused conflict. In 1948 the Western powers introduced a new currency, the Deutschmark, in their zones and in West Berlin. Stalin responded with the Berlin Blockade, cutting off all road, rail and canal links to West Berlin, but the West supplied the city by air for almost a year in the Berlin Airlift. The blockade was lifted in May 1949, and in the same year two German states were created: the Federal Republic of Germany in the west and the communist German Democratic Republic in the east. West Berlin remained linked to West Germany.

West Berlin now became a serious problem for the communists. Helped by Marshall Aid, it became a prosperous 'shop window' for capitalism deep inside East Germany, and a base for Western spies and radio propaganda. Above all, it was an escape route. East Germany sealed its main border with West Germany in 1952, but people could still move freely inside Berlin. About 2.7 million East Germans fled between 1949 and 1961, many of them young, skilled workers, and this 'brain drain' badly damaged the East German economy.

Khrushchev tried to solve the problem by forcing the West out. His ultimatum of 1958 demanded that West Berlin become a demilitarised 'free city', and he renewed the demand at the Vienna Summit in June 1961, but Kennedy refused to leave. As the flight of refugees grew, Ulbricht pressed for action. In early August 1961 the Warsaw Pact leaders agreed to close the border, and on 13 August the border round West Berlin was sealed with barbed wire, soon to be replaced by the concrete Berlin Wall.

Explanation

A strong account links the post-war division and the Blockade to the creation of two German states, explains why West Berlin then became an escape route and 'shop window', and shows why Khrushchev's failure to remove the West led to the Wall. Level 4 explains each link in the chain.

Mark scheme
  1. 8 marks

    Levels of response (8 marks).
    Level 4 (7-8 marks): Complex analysis: a coherent, well-structured account that explains how the four-power division of Berlin (1945), the Berlin Blockade (1948-49) and the creation of two German states (1949) left West Berlin as a Western island inside East Germany, how this created the refugee problem and the crisis of 1958-61, and why it ended with the sealing of the border in 1961, supported by extended, accurate knowledge.
    Level 3 (5-6 marks): Developed analysis in a well-ordered account: explains several stages from 1945 to 1961 with accurate knowledge, though some links are less developed.
    Level 2 (3-4 marks): Simple analysis: a basic account of some stages, with limited explanation of how they led to the Wall.
    Level 1 (1-2 marks): Basic analysis: general statements, e.g. 'Berlin was split so they built a wall', with limited knowledge.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): Yalta and Potsdam (1945) - Germany and Berlin divided into four zones/sectors; Berlin lay about 160 km inside the Soviet zone; disputes over reparations and the economy; 1948 - the Western zones introduced a new currency (Deutschmark); Stalin's Berlin Blockade (June 1948-May 1949) failed because of the Berlin Airlift; 1949 - the Federal Republic of Germany (West) and the German Democratic Republic (East) were created, and West Berlin stayed linked to the West; West Berlin, helped by Marshall Aid, became a prosperous 'shop window' and a base for Western spies; the inner German border was sealed in 1952, but movement inside Berlin remained free, making it the main escape route; about 2.7 million East Germans fled 1949-61 - a 'brain drain' of young, skilled workers; Khrushchev's ultimatum (1958) and demands at Vienna (1961) failed to remove the West from Berlin; Ulbricht pressed for action; early August 1961 - Warsaw Pact agreed to close the border; 13 August 1961 - border sealed, then a concrete wall built.

Question 4

20 marks

'Khrushchev, rather than Ulbricht, was responsible for the building of the Berlin Wall.'

How far do you agree with this statement?

Explain your answer.

[16 marks] [SPaG 4 marks]

Model answer

The Berlin Wall was begun on 13 August 1961 by East German forces, on a decision approved by the Soviet Union and the other Warsaw Pact states. Both Nikita Khrushchev, the Soviet leader, and Walter Ulbricht, the leader of East Germany, played a part. I think Khrushchev bears the final responsibility, because nothing could happen without his approval, but Ulbricht did more to push for the Wall, so the statement is only partly true.

Khrushchev's responsibility is clear. East Germany was a Soviet satellite state, with about 20 Soviet divisions on its territory, and Ulbricht could not close the border without Moscow's permission. Khrushchev had also created the crisis over Berlin. In November 1958 he issued his ultimatum, demanding that the Western powers leave West Berlin within six months, and at the Vienna Summit in June 1961 he renewed the threat, giving the West until the end of the year. When Kennedy refused to back down and announced a military build-up in July 1961, Khrushchev needed a way to solve the problem of West Berlin without a war. In early August 1961 the Warsaw Pact leaders met in Moscow and agreed to close the border. Soviet troops stood behind the East German forces when it happened. Khrushchev also judged that Kennedy, whom he thought weak after the Bay of Pigs and Vienna, would not fight. Later, in his memoirs, he defended the Wall as the only way to stop the loss of East Germany's skilled workers.

However, Ulbricht's role was very important. For years he had pressed Khrushchev to close the border, because his state was losing its people: about 2.7 million East Germans fled between 1949 and 1961, many of them young, skilled workers. His own policies, such as collectivising farms and relying on the secret police, had made many people want to leave. Khrushchev at first preferred a peace treaty that would force the West out of Berlin, and some historians argue that Ulbricht pushed a reluctant Khrushchev into accepting a wall. On 15 June 1961 Ulbricht publicly denied that anyone intended to build a wall, which only made more people flee, increasing the pressure for action.

Ulbricht's government also planned and built the Wall. The operation was organised by Erich Honecker, and it was East German soldiers, police and workers' militia who sealed the border with barbed wire on the night of 12-13 August and then built the concrete wall. Ulbricht continued to push for tighter control afterwards, for example by having his guards demand to check the papers of American officials, which led to the stand-off at Checkpoint Charlie in October 1961.

Other factors also played a part. The refugees themselves created the crisis, and the West's signals made the Wall possible. Kennedy's 'three essentials' concerned only West Berlin, and Senator Fulbright said that East Germany had a right to close its border, suggesting the USA would not resist.

In conclusion, I agree only in part. Khrushchev was ultimately responsible, because he created the Berlin crisis, made the final decision with the other Warsaw Pact leaders and provided the Soviet power that made it safe. But Ulbricht was the driving force: he pressed for the Wall for years, his policies caused the flight that made it necessary, and his government planned and built it. It is most accurate to say that Khrushchev took the decision, but Ulbricht made it happen.

Explanation

Balance Khrushchev's role (the 1958-61 crisis, the final decision, Soviet power) against Ulbricht's (years of pressure, the GDR's crisis, planning and building the Wall), and consider the refugees and Western signals. Level 4 reaches a sustained judgement, e.g. 'Khrushchev decided, Ulbricht drove it'.

Mark scheme
  1. 16 marks

    Levels of response (16 marks).
    Level 4 (13-16 marks): Complex explanation of Khrushchev's responsibility (the final decision, the 1958-61 crisis, the Warsaw Pact decision, Soviet power behind the operation) and Ulbricht's responsibility (years of pressure, the GDR's crisis, the planning and building by East German forces), and possibly other factors (the refugees, Western policy), supported by extended, accurate knowledge, leading to a sustained judgement.
    Level 3 (9-12 marks): Developed explanation of the roles of both leaders, or a well-developed explanation of one with some reference to the other, supported by relevant, accurate knowledge; a judgement may be given but is not fully sustained.
    Level 2 (5-8 marks): Simple explanation of the role of Khrushchev or Ulbricht, with some relevant knowledge.
    Level 1 (1-4 marks): Basic explanation: general statements, with limited knowledge.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): Khrushchev - East Germany depended on the USSR, so nothing could happen without his approval; his ultimatum (November 1958) began the Berlin crisis; he renewed it at Vienna (June 1961); when Kennedy refused to back down he chose a wall rather than war; the Warsaw Pact leaders agreed the decision in Moscow in early August 1961; about 20 Soviet divisions in East Germany stood behind the operation; he later defended the decision in his memoirs; his belief that Kennedy was weak; Ulbricht - he had pressed Khrushchev for years to close the border; his regime's policies (collectivisation, repression) caused much of the flight; the GDR was losing its skilled workers; he publicly denied the plan on 15 June 1961 ('Nobody has any intention of building a wall'); the operation was planned by Erich Honecker and carried out by East German soldiers, police and workers' militia; he pushed for more control, e.g. over Allied access, which led to the Checkpoint Charlie stand-off; some historians argue Ulbricht pushed a reluctant Khrushchev into it - the junior partner driving the senior; Khrushchev had preferred a treaty to a wall; other factors - the refugees themselves; the West's signals (Kennedy's 'three essentials', Fulbright's remark); possible judgements - Khrushchev took the decision but Ulbricht drove it; or shared responsibility; or the refugee crisis made a decision unavoidable.

  2. 4 marks

    SPaG. High performance (4 marks): spells and punctuates with consistent accuracy; uses rules of grammar with effective control of meaning overall; uses a wide range of specialist terms as appropriate.
    Intermediate performance (2-3 marks): spells and punctuates with considerable accuracy; uses rules of grammar with general control of meaning overall; uses a good range of specialist terms as appropriate.
    Threshold performance (1 mark): spells and punctuates with reasonable accuracy; uses rules of grammar with some control of meaning and any errors do not significantly hinder meaning overall; uses a limited range of specialist terms as appropriate.
    0 marks: the student writes nothing, or the response does not relate to the question, or errors severely hinder meaning.

    SPaG marks are awarded only if the answer relates to the question.

Ready to try the rest? Every answer you write is marked against the mark scheme, so you can see exactly where the marks are.

AI Tutor Hints first, answers after you try

Hi! Stuck? Ask me for a hint and I’ll help you work it out. Once you’ve checked your answer I can explain exactly where the marks are.