Source B: a summary of the 'Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places', issued by Osama bin Laden from Afghanistan in August 1996 and published in Al-Quds Al-Arabi, a London-based Arabic newspaper.
The declaration says that the presence of American troops in Saudi Arabia is the greatest aggression Muslims have suffered since the death of the Prophet Muhammad. It attacks the Saudi royal family for allowing the troops in and for failing to rule properly by Islamic law. It lists the suffering of Muslims in Palestine, Iraq, Lebanon, Bosnia and Chechnya, and calls on Muslims to drive the Americans out of the Arabian Peninsula, using secret, fast-moving forces because the enemy is so powerful, and to boycott American goods.
Source C: a summary of an interview with Osama bin Laden by the American television network ABC, recorded at a camp in Afghanistan in May 1998 and broadcast in the USA.
Bin Laden said that all Americans were targets, whether soldiers or civilians. He said that US troops must leave the Arabian Peninsula and that the USA must stop supporting Israel. He claimed that the American withdrawal from Somalia in 1993 showed that American soldiers were weak and would run away when attacked.
How useful are Sources B and C to an historian studying the aims of al-Qaeda?
Explain your answer using Sources B and C and your contextual knowledge.
Model answer
Source B is very useful for studying al-Qaeda's aims because it is Osama bin Laden's own declaration of war, so it shows directly what he wanted. Its main demand is that the Americans be driven out of the Arabian Peninsula, which he calls the greatest aggression since the death of the Prophet. This fits what I know: US troops had arrived in Saudi Arabia in August 1990 to defend it against Iraq, and several thousand stayed after the Gulf War, close to Islam's holiest cities, Mecca and Medina. Source B also shows a second aim, overthrowing the Saudi royal family, which bin Laden attacked for letting the troops in, and it shows that he wanted to appear as the defender of Muslims everywhere, from Palestine to Chechnya. The provenance adds to its value but also limits it. It was issued in August 1996, just after Sudan had expelled bin Laden under Saudi and US pressure, so it is full of anger at the Saudi government. It was written in Arabic for Muslims, so it uses religious language and stresses the Saudis' failings in order to win supporters. The advice to use secret, fast-moving forces is useful because it shows that al-Qaeda planned terrorism, not a conventional war.
Source C is useful because it shows how al-Qaeda's aims had widened by 1998. In 1996 bin Laden had targeted American troops; in Source C he says that all Americans, soldiers or civilians, are targets, and he adds ending US support for Israel. This matches the fatwa of February 1998, which made killing Americans a religious duty. His comment on Somalia is useful because it shows why he thought terrorism would work: he believed the USA would withdraw if it suffered casualties, as it had after the deaths of US soldiers in Mogadishu in 1993. However, the provenance means it must be used carefully. It was an interview for American television, so bin Laden wanted to frighten Americans and make al-Qaeda seem powerful, and he may have exaggerated. Its timing makes it especially valuable, though: less than three months later al-Qaeda bombed the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, proving that the threats were real.
Overall, the two sources are very useful together. Both come from al-Qaeda's leader, so they show its stated aims more directly than any outside observer could, and together they show the aims growing from expelling US troops in 1996 to a war on all Americans by 1998. Their weakness is that they are propaganda: they show what bin Laden wanted people to believe, and they say little about the long-term aim of a strict Islamic state or the different priorities of others in al-Qaeda, such as al-Zawahiri.
Explanation
Level 4 needs a judgement on both sources based on content and provenance: who wrote each, when, for which audience and why. Here the key points are that both come from bin Laden (direct evidence of his aims but propaganda), that B was aimed at Muslims and C at Americans, and that comparing 1996 with 1998 shows the aims widening to include civilians.