'Edward I's settlement of Wales after 1283 was harsh on the Welsh people.'
How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer.
Model answer
Edward's settlement was harsh in many ways, especially for the ruling family of Gwynedd and for Welsh people who lived near the new castles and towns. However, for many ordinary Welsh people in the countryside it brought more continuity than change, so I agree only in part.
The settlement was undoubtedly harsh on the princes and on Welsh independence. Dafydd was executed at Shrewsbury in October 1283, Llywelyn's baby daughter Gwenllian was confined in Sempringham Priory for life, and the relic of the princes, the Croes Naid, was taken to England. The Statute of Rhuddlan of 1284 annexed the principality to the English Crown and set up English-style counties under English officials such as the Justice of North Wales at Caernarfon. English criminal law replaced Welsh law for serious crimes. The Welsh had lost their own rulers.
The settlement was also harsh because it was a colonial one. Huge castles were begun at Conwy, Caernarfon and Harlech in 1283, each with a walled borough for English settlers who were given trading privileges, while the Welsh were excluded from living in them. Whole Welsh communities were moved: the monks of Aberconwy Abbey, burial place of Llywelyn the Great, were moved to Maenan to make way for Conwy, and later the people of Llanfaes were moved to Newborough when Beaumaris was built. In north-east Wales new Marcher lordships were given to English lords - Henry de Lacy at Denbigh, Reginald de Grey at Ruthin - and at Denbigh English settlers took the best land while Welsh tenants were moved to poorer land. Heavy taxation in the early 1290s and the call-up of Welshmen to fight in Gascony led to Madog ap Llywelyn's revolt in 1294.
On the other hand, Edward did not try to destroy Welsh society. The Statute of Rhuddlan kept Welsh law and custom for most civil cases, such as disputes over land and debts, and Welsh inheritance customs largely survived. Welshmen continued to serve as local officials in the commotes. Welsh lords who had supported Edward, such as Gruffudd ap Gwenwynwyn of Powys, kept their lands. Many of the dues ordinary people paid were the same as those they had paid to the princes, whose own rule had been heavy - Llywelyn's taxes had made him unpopular. For most Welsh farmers, daily life went on much as before.
Overall, the settlement was harsh on the Welsh as a people with their own rulers and on the communities pushed aside for castles, towns and English settlers, and it made the Welsh feel like second-class subjects in their own land, as the revolt of 1294-95 shows. But it was not harsh in every way: by keeping Welsh civil law and local customs, Edward created a settlement that most Welsh people could live with, which is why it lasted until 1536. It was harsh in its aims and symbols, but more moderate in everyday government.
Explanation
The settlement destroyed the house of Gwynedd, annexed the principality, imposed English officials, castles, boroughs and Marcher lords and moved Welsh communities, but it kept Welsh civil law, local officials and the lands of loyal Welsh lords. Level 4 weighs both sides with specific detail and sustains a judgement about how harsh it was and for whom; a one-sided list is Level 2.