Level:
Correct: 0
Incorrect: 0
Marks: 0/0
Exam Practice
Subject:
Topics:
AQA GCSE History (Edward I) Smart practice A mixed round aimed at your weak spots
Unit 1
Part one: Government, the rights of King and people
Unit 2
Part two: Life in Medieval England
Unit 3
Part three: Edward I’s military campaigns in Wales and Scotland
Unit 4
Part four: The historic environment of Medieval England
Avg
score:
–
Topics
done:
0/10

Historic environment: Acton Burnell Castle (2028 exams)

Practise 26 exam-style questions on Historic environment: Acton Burnell Castle (2028 exams) for AQA GCSE History (Edward I). Write your answer as you would in the exam and get it marked in seconds against the mark scheme, point by point, with an AI tutor on hand if you get stuck.

  • 26 questions
  • 1–16 marks each
  • Instant marking
  • No sign-up needed
20 questions, marked as you go

Sample questions with model answers

Here are 4 of the questions in this topic, each with a model answer, an explanation of why it earns the marks and the mark scheme an examiner would use.

Question 1

2 marks

Explain what a licence to crenellate was, and give the year in which Robert Burnell received one for his house at Acton Burnell.

Model answer

A licence to crenellate was permission from the king to fortify a house by adding battlements. Robert Burnell received one for Acton Burnell in 1284.

Explanation

Kings tried to control the building of private fortifications, so a lord who wanted battlements asked for a royal licence. By the late 13th century a licence was as much a mark of royal favour and status as a military matter: Burnell's licence of 1284, granted by the king he served as Chancellor, allowed him to give his new house battlements and towers.

Mark scheme
  1. 1 mark

    A licence to crenellate was permission from the king to fortify a house by adding battlements (crenellations).

    Accept royal permission to build battlements / to fortify a building / to build a castle. Do not accept a licence to build any house, or permission from the Church.

  2. 1 mark

    1284.

    Accept 1284 only.

Question 2

8 marks

Interpretation A: from a history of parliament written for students in 1995. (Written for practice.)
In 1283 the commons of England met in a great barn at Acton Burnell, while the lords sat in Burnell's house nearby. It was a turning point. For the first time, knights and townsmen helped to make the laws of England, and the statute passed there gave merchants a new way to recover their debts. The ruined barn at Acton Burnell deserves to be remembered as one of the birthplaces of the House of Commons.

How convincing is Interpretation A about the importance of the parliament of 1283? Explain your answer based on your contextual knowledge and what it says in Interpretation A.

Model answer

Interpretation A is partly convincing. The parliament of 1283 was significant. It was summoned to Shrewsbury in the autumn, after the conquest of Wales, and as well as the great lords it included knights from the shires and representatives of about 20 towns. Its main business was the trial of Dafydd ap Gruffudd, Llywelyn's brother, who was condemned and executed as a traitor. The king and his council then moved to Acton Burnell, where the Statute of Acton Burnell was issued in October. This Statute of Merchants allowed a merchant to have a debt recorded before the mayor of London, York or Bristol and, if it was not paid, to have the debtor's goods sold, so it is true that it gave merchants a new way to recover their debts. Local tradition says that the commons met in the great barn on the estate, whose gable ends still stand.

However, the interpretation exaggerates the importance of 1283. It was not 'the first time' that knights and townsmen were involved: Simon de Montfort's parliament of January 1265 included knights and burgesses, and Edward I's first parliament at Westminster in 1275 included representatives of the shires and towns, who agreed the new customs duty on wool. Earlier in 1283 itself, knights and townsmen had been summoned to assemblies at York and Northampton to grant a tax for the Welsh war. Nor did these representatives really 'make the laws': statutes were drawn up by the king and his council, led by Burnell, and the representatives were summoned mainly to agree and to grant taxes. The story of the barn is only a tradition, and the Commons did not sit as a separate house until the fourteenth century. Most historians see the 'Model Parliament' of 1295 as a more important step.

Overall, Interpretation A is convincing that 1283 was an important parliament that included representatives and produced a useful statute, but its claim that this was a first and a birthplace of the House of Commons is an exaggeration, perhaps because a book for students looks for clear milestones.

Explanation

The 1283 parliament included knights and townsmen and produced the Statute of Acton Burnell, but representatives had attended in 1265 and 1275, statutes were made by king and council, the barn story is tradition and 1295 is usually seen as the bigger step. Level 4 tests each claim with specific knowledge and sustains a judgement.

Mark scheme
  1. 8 marks

    Levels of response (8 marks).
    Level 4 (7-8 marks): Complex evaluation of Interpretation A with a sustained judgement based on contextual knowledge, e.g. weighs the evidence that the 1283 parliament included representatives of the shires and towns and produced the Statute of Acton Burnell against its claims of being 'the first time' and a 'birthplace of the Commons' (1265, 1275 and 1295 parliaments; the tradition of the barn is uncertain; the Commons did not sit separately until later), reaching a sustained judgement.
    Level 3 (5-6 marks): Developed evaluation of Interpretation A based on contextual knowledge: explains, with specific knowledge, how far two or more of its claims are supported and/or challenged.
    Level 2 (3-4 marks): Simple evaluation of Interpretation A based on contextual knowledge, e.g. agrees that a statute for merchants was passed.
    Level 1 (1-2 marks): Basic analysis of Interpretation A: identifies or paraphrases what it says, with little or no contextual knowledge.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): Convincing: the parliament summoned to Shrewsbury in autumn 1283 included not only magnates but knights from the shires and representatives of about 20 towns; it tried and condemned Dafydd ap Gruffudd; the king then moved to Acton Burnell, where the Statute of Acton Burnell (a Statute of Merchants) was issued in October 1283 - it let merchants record debts before the mayor of London, York or Bristol and have a defaulting debtor's goods sold, so it did 'give merchants a new way to recover their debts'; the townsmen present had a direct interest in such a law; local tradition says the commons met in the great barn, whose gable ends survive. Less convincing: 'for the first time' is wrong - Simon de Montfort's parliament of January 1265 included knights and burgesses, and Edward I's first parliament (Westminster, 1275) included representatives of shires and towns, who agreed the new customs duty on wool; in January 1283 knights and townsmen had also been summoned to assemblies at York and Northampton to grant a tax; statutes were made by the king and his council - the representatives were summoned mainly to hear, agree and grant taxes rather than to 'make the laws'; the story of the barn is a tradition and cannot be proved; the commons did not sit as a separate 'House of Commons' until the 14th century; the 'Model Parliament' of 1295 is usually seen as a more important step; the main business at Shrewsbury was the trial of Dafydd. Provenance: a history of parliament written for students may look for milestones and simplify. Possible judgement: convincing that 1283 was a significant parliament with representatives and an important statute, but exaggerated as the first or a birthplace of the Commons.

Question 3

8 marks

Explain what was important about the licence to crenellate that Robert Burnell received for Acton Burnell in 1284.

Model answer

The licence was important first because it showed royal control over fortification. A licence to crenellate was the king's permission to fortify a building with battlements. Kings tried to control private castles because fortified houses built without permission had been used against the Crown in the past, for example in the civil wars of Stephen's reign and in the Barons' Wars of the 1260s, which Edward had fought in himself. By asking for a licence, Burnell recognised the king's authority, and he gained legal protection against any later accusation of building an unlicensed castle.

Secondly, the licence was a mark of royal favour and status. Burnell was Edward's Chancellor and closest minister, and the licence was granted by the king he served. Battlements were a symbol of lordship, so the licence allowed a royal clerk from a family of minor Shropshire landowners to give his house the appearance of a great lord's castle. It was granted in 1284, the year after Edward had stayed at Acton Burnell and the Statute of Acton Burnell had been issued there, which shows how close the two men were.

Finally, the licence shaped the design of the house and tells us about the period. Acton Burnell has battlements and four corner towers, but its large first-floor windows, walls only about 1.5 m thick and lack of a gatehouse show that the licence was used for display, not for serious defence. This makes sense because by 1284 Edward had completed the conquest of Wales, so the Welsh threat to Shropshire was much reduced. Burnell was also following a wider fashion: in 1291 Lawrence of Ludlow, a rich wool merchant, obtained a licence for Stokesay, also in Shropshire. So the licence explains why a comfortable house is called a castle, and shows that by the 1280s battlements had become as much a badge of status as a means of defence.

Explanation

A licence to crenellate was royal permission to fortify; for Burnell it was a mark of the king's favour and a badge of status, and the house's large windows and thin walls show it was used for display after the Welsh threat had receded in 1283-84. Level 4 links the licence to royal authority, status and the design of the building.

Mark scheme
  1. 8 marks

    Levels of response (8 marks).
    Level 4 (7-8 marks): Complex explanation of the importance of the licence, analysing two or more aspects (e.g. royal control of fortification; the licence as a mark of royal favour and status; its effect on the design of the house; what its timing and the fashion for licences show about the period) with the aspects explicitly linked and supported by specific knowledge.
    Level 3 (5-6 marks): Developed explanation of two or more aspects of the licence's importance, supported by specific knowledge.
    Level 2 (3-4 marks): Simple explanation of one aspect, e.g. it allowed Burnell to add battlements.
    Level 1 (1-2 marks): Basic explanation: general statements with little explanation.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): A licence to crenellate was the king's permission to fortify a building with battlements (crenellations); kings tried to control private fortification because castles built without permission had been used against the Crown, for example in the civil wars of Stephen's reign and the Barons' Wars of the 1260s; asking for a licence showed loyalty and recognised royal authority; for Burnell, Edward's Chancellor, the licence was a mark of royal favour granted by the king he served; battlements were a symbol of lordship and nobility, so the licence let a royal clerk from a minor Shropshire family display the status of a great lord; it shaped the design: Acton Burnell has battlements and four corner towers, but its large windows, thin walls (about 1.5 m) and lack of a gatehouse show the licence was used for display rather than serious defence; the timing - 1284, the year after the conquest of Wales was completed and the king's visit and parliament of 1283 - shows that defence against the Welsh was no longer the main concern; it was part of a wider fashion: wealthy men such as Lawrence of Ludlow, a wool merchant, obtained a licence for Stokesay in Shropshire in 1291; licences gave legal protection against later accusations of building an unlicensed castle; the licence explains why such a comfortable house is called a castle.

Question 4

16 marks

'Acton Burnell Castle shows that Robert Burnell was Edward I's most important servant.'

How far does a study of Acton Burnell Castle support this statement? Explain your answer. You should refer to Acton Burnell Castle and your contextual knowledge.

Model answer

A study of Acton Burnell Castle gives strong support to the view that Robert Burnell was one of Edward I's most important servants, and probably his most important minister in government between 1274 and 1292. However, the site cannot prove on its own that he was the most important servant of the whole reign, because a building shows wealth rather than influence, and other servants were vital in war, finance and diplomacy, especially after Burnell's death.

The site supports the statement in several ways. The house itself, a large block of fine red sandstone with a great hall, private chamber, large windows and battlements, shows great wealth, which Burnell had gained mainly through royal service. The licence to crenellate of 1284 was a royal favour. Most strikingly, Edward I and his council came to Acton Burnell in 1283, after the parliament at Shrewsbury, and the Statute of Acton Burnell was issued there. The king came to his minister's home and issued a statute that still bears its name, which shows exceptional closeness and trust.

Burnell's career strengthens this evidence. He had served Edward as a clerk since the 1260s, and in 1272-74 he was one of the three men who governed England while the new king returned from crusade. He was Chancellor and keeper of the Great Seal from 1274 to 1292, head of the Chancery and in effect Edward's chief minister, and in 1275 he became Bishop of Bath and Wells. Edward tried twice to make him Archbishop of Canterbury. He is thought to have led the drafting of Edward's great statutes, from Westminster I in 1275 to Quia Emptores in 1290, and he was involved in the settlement of Wales and in the Great Cause, dying at Berwick in 1292.

However, the site has limits as evidence. A great house shows that its owner was rich, not necessarily that he was the most important man in government: Lawrence of Ludlow, a wool merchant, built a similar fortified manor house at Stokesay. The story that parliament met in the barn is only a tradition, and the building cannot show Burnell's daily work in the Chancery.

Other servants were also vital. Antony Bek, Bishop of Durham, was a leading diplomat and commanded troops at Falkirk in 1298. Otto de Grandson, Edward's closest friend, served him in Wales, Gascony and on diplomatic missions. Master James of St George designed the great castles that held down Wales, and earls such as John de Warenne, Earl of Surrey, and Henry de Lacy, Earl of Lincoln, led Edward's armies. The treasurers John Kirkby and Walter Langton ran the royal finances, and Langton dominated government in the last years of the reign. Burnell died in 1292, so he played no part in the wars against France and Scotland or the crisis of 1297. Even in Burnell's lifetime, the key decisions were made by Edward himself, and the pope's refusal to accept Burnell as archbishop in 1278 shows the limits of his standing.

Overall, Acton Burnell supports the view that Burnell was Edward's most important minister in government for the first twenty years of the reign. But 'most important servant' overstates what the site can show, because Edward relied on different men for war, money and diplomacy, and the second half of the reign was run without Burnell.

Explanation

The house, the licence and the royal visit and statute of 1283 show Burnell's wealth and closeness to the king, supported by his 18 years as Chancellor; but a building shows wealth rather than influence, and Bek, Grandson, Langton, Master James and the earls mattered greatly, especially after Burnell died in 1292. Level 4 sustains a judgement about 'most important', weighing the site's evidence against the wider reign.

Mark scheme
  1. 16 marks

    Levels of response (16 marks).
    Level 4 (13-16 marks): Complex explanation of what the site shows about Burnell's importance (wealth, royal favour, the king's visit and parliament of 1283, the statute) and of the evidence from his career, weighed against the limits of the site as evidence and the importance of other servants (e.g. Bek, Grandson, Kirkby, Langton, Master James, the earls), with a sustained judgement about whether he was Edward's most important servant.
    Level 3 (9-12 marks): Developed explanation of Burnell's importance shown by the site and his career, with at least some consideration of other servants or the limits of the evidence; a judgement is reached but not fully sustained.
    Level 2 (5-8 marks): Simple explanation of Burnell's importance or of other servants, e.g. explains that he was Chancellor.
    Level 1 (1-4 marks): Basic explanation, with little specific knowledge.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): Supporting: the size, fine red sandstone and design of the house show great wealth, gained mainly through royal service; the licence to crenellate (1284) was a royal favour; Edward I and his council came to Acton Burnell in 1283 after the Shrewsbury parliament, and the Statute of Acton Burnell was issued there - the king came to his minister's home; his career: Edward's clerk in the 1260s, one of those who governed England in 1272-74, Chancellor and keeper of the Great Seal 1274-92 - the longest-serving and most trusted minister of the first half of the reign, Bishop of Bath and Wells (1275), Edward twice tried to make him Archbishop of Canterbury; associated with Edward's great statutes (Westminster I, Gloucester, Mortmain, Wales, Westminster II, Winchester, Quia Emptores); involved in the settlement of Wales and present at the Great Cause when he died at Berwick in 1292. Against / limits: a building shows wealth and status, not necessarily importance - other rich men (e.g. Lawrence of Ludlow at Stokesay) built similar houses; the barn parliament is a tradition; the site cannot show his day-to-day work; other servants were vital: Antony Bek, Bishop of Durham (diplomat and commander, Falkirk 1298), Otto de Grandson (Edward's closest friend, used in Wales, Gascony and diplomacy), John Kirkby and Walter Langton (treasurers - Langton dominated government after 1295), Master James of St George (the Welsh castles), the earls who led armies (Surrey, Lincoln), judges; Burnell died in 1292, so he played no part in the wars and crises of 1294-1307; Edward himself made the key decisions; the pope's refusal to make him archbishop shows the limits of his standing. Possible judgements: the site supports the view that he was Edward's most important minister in government in 1274-92, but not that he was the most important servant of the whole reign; 'most important' depends on whether government, war or diplomacy is considered.

Ready to try the rest? Every answer you write is marked against the mark scheme, so you can see exactly where the marks are.

AI Tutor Hints first, answers after you try

Hi! Stuck? Ask me for a hint and I’ll help you work it out. Once you’ve checked your answer I can explain exactly where the marks are.