Level:
Correct: 0
Incorrect: 0
Marks: 0/0
Exam Practice
Subject:
Topics:
AQA GCSE History (Germany 1890-1945) Smart practice A mixed round aimed at your weak spots
Unit 1
Part one: Germany and the growth of democracy
Unit 2
Part two: Germany and the Depression
Unit 3
Part three: The experiences of Germans under the Nazis
Avg
score:
–
Topics
done:
0/9

The impact of the Depression

Practise 46 exam-style questions on The impact of the Depression for AQA GCSE History (Germany 1890-1945). Write your answer as you would in the exam and get it marked in seconds against the mark scheme, point by point, with an AI tutor on hand if you get stuck.

  • 46 questions
  • 1–12 marks each
  • Instant marking
  • No sign-up needed
20 questions, marked as you go

Sample questions with model answers

Here are 4 of the questions in this topic, each with a model answer, an explanation of why it earns the marks and the mark scheme an examiner would use.

Question 1

1 mark

Figure 1 is a flow chart showing how the Wall Street Crash affected Germany. What should replace box A?

How the Wall Street Crash affected Germany. Flow chart of 5 boxes joined by arrows, read from top to bottom. The first box is "Wall Street Crash (October 1929)", which leads to "US banks recall their loans to Germany", which leads to box A, which leads to "Unemployment rises (6 million by 1932)", which leads to "Support for extremist parties grows".

Model answer

German businesses and factories cut production or closed down.

Explanation

German firms had relied on short-term American loans since the Dawes Plan of 1924. When the loans were recalled, businesses could not pay for wages and materials, so they cut production or went bankrupt, and unemployment rose to about 6 million by 1932.

Mark scheme
  1. 1 mark

    German businesses and factories cut production or closed / went bankrupt

    Accept any answer showing that German firms cut back or failed, e.g. 'factories closed', 'businesses went bankrupt', 'firms could not pay wages and laid off workers'. Do not accept 'unemployment rose' on its own (it is the next box) or 'the Depression' on its own.

Question 2

4 marks

Interpretation A: from the memoirs of a man who joined the SA in Berlin in 1930 after losing his job, published in 1958. (Written for practice.)
When the factory closed I had nothing: no money, no work and no hope. The SA gave me a brown shirt, hot meals in the SA hostel and comrades who stood by each other. We marched through the streets to show Germany that there was still order and discipline. Yes, there were fights, but the Reds attacked our meetings first and the police did nothing. We protected Hitler's speakers so that people could hear the truth. For thousands of unemployed young men like me, the SA was a family.

Interpretation B: from an interview with a woman who lived in a working-class district of Hamburg in 1932, recorded in 1980. (Written for practice.)
The SA came into our streets to provoke us. They marched through districts where they knew they were hated, singing their songs and looking for a fight. They broke up our meetings, beat up Communists and Social Democrats and smashed windows. People were frightened to put up posters or say what they thought. In the summer of 1932 there was shooting in Altona and people were killed. The SA did not bring order; they created the chaos, so that Hitler could pretend that only he could end it.

How does Interpretation B differ from Interpretation A about the role of the SA? Explain your answer based on what it says in Interpretations A and B.

Model answer

Interpretation A presents the SA as a positive force. The author says it gave unemployed men like him a brown shirt, hot meals and comrades, so it was 'a family'. He claims its marches showed 'order and discipline', and that its fighting was only self-defence, because 'the Reds attacked our meetings first' and the SA was simply protecting Hitler's speakers so people could hear the truth.

Interpretation B takes the opposite view. The woman says the SA came into working-class streets 'to provoke us' and was 'looking for a fight'. It broke up meetings, beat up Communists and Social Democrats and frightened people into silence, and she remembers the shooting in Altona in 1932. Rather than bringing order, B argues the SA 'created the chaos' on purpose, so that Hitler could pretend only he could end it. So A sees the SA as a source of support and order, while B sees it as a source of deliberate terror.

Explanation

The difference lies in the content: A stresses the SA's help for the unemployed, its discipline and defensive fighting; B stresses provocation, intimidation and deliberately created chaos. Level 2 explains the difference with support from both interpretations.

Mark scheme
  1. 4 marks

    Levels of response (4 marks).
    Level 2 (3-4 marks): Developed analysis of the interpretations: explains how they differ about the role of the SA, supported by what each says, e.g. A presents the SA as a 'family' that helped the unemployed, showed order and discipline and only fought to defend Nazi meetings from Communist attack, whereas B presents it as an aggressive force that deliberately provoked violence, terrorised opponents and created chaos so that Hitler could pose as the man to end it.
    Level 1 (1-2 marks): Simple analysis: identifies a difference, e.g. 'A says the SA was good but B says it was violent', with little reference to the content.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): A - the SA gave the unemployed a shirt, hot meals in hostels and comrades; marches showed 'order and discipline'; violence was defensive ('the Reds attacked our meetings first'); it protected Hitler's speakers; it was 'a family'. B - the SA came 'to provoke us', marching where it was hated and 'looking for a fight'; broke up meetings, beat up Communists and Social Democrats, smashed windows; people were too frightened to speak; shooting and deaths in Altona (1932); the SA 'created the chaos' deliberately to help Hitler. Differences: the SA as a source of support and order (A) v. a source of terror and chaos (B); who started the violence (Communists in A, the SA in B); its purpose (protecting free speech v. intimidating opponents and manufacturing a crisis).

Question 3

8 marks

In what ways were the lives of middle-class Germans affected by the Depression in the years 1929-1932? Explain your answer.

Model answer

One way middle-class Germans were affected was the loss of their livelihoods. As unemployment rose towards 6 million, ordinary people had little money to spend, so shopkeepers, craftsmen and small businessmen lost customers and many went bankrupt. White-collar workers such as clerks and office staff lost their jobs in large numbers, and even secure civil servants and teachers had their salaries cut several times by Brüning's emergency decrees. Students and young graduates found there were no jobs for them at all.

A second way was the threat to their savings and status. In July 1931 the Danat Bank collapsed and the banks closed for several days. This revived terrible memories of 1923, when hyperinflation had wiped out middle-class savings. Many middle-class families now feared that they would sink into the working class, losing the respectability that mattered so much to them.

Because of these losses, the middle classes also became frightened and politically restless. The Communist Party grew from 54 seats in 1928 to 100 in November 1932 and promised to abolish private property, which terrified shopkeepers and property owners. Feeling that the Weimar parties had failed them, middle-class voters deserted the liberal and conservative parties: the DVP fell from 45 seats in 1928 to just 7 in July 1932, and the DNVP from 73 to 37. Many turned instead to the Nazis, who promised order, protection from communism and help for small businesses against department stores. So the Depression affected the middle classes economically, socially and politically, and helped make them the backbone of Nazi support.

Explanation

Key knowledge: bankrupt shops and businesses, lost white-collar jobs, salary cuts for civil servants, the 1931 banking crisis and memories of 1923, fear of communism, and the collapse of the DVP, DDP and DNVP vote in favour of the Nazis. Level 4 needs several developed, linked ways, such as connecting economic losses to fear and then to voting Nazi.

Mark scheme
  1. 8 marks

    Levels of response (8 marks).
    Level 4 (7-8 marks): Complex explanation of the changes: several developed explanations of different ways middle-class lives were affected (e.g. ruined businesses, lost jobs and salary cuts, threatened savings and status, fear of communism, changing political loyalties), supported by precise knowledge and linked, e.g. showing how economic losses and fear of falling into poverty led many middle-class voters to abandon their old parties for the Nazis.
    Level 3 (5-6 marks): Developed explanation of two or more ways middle-class lives were affected, each supported by relevant knowledge.
    Level 2 (3-4 marks): Simple explanation of one way, or several ways described with little explanation.
    Level 1 (1-2 marks): Basic explanation: general statements (e.g. 'they lost money') with little specific knowledge.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): shopkeepers, craftsmen and small businessmen lost customers as unemployment rose towards 6 million, and many went bankrupt; they resented big department stores and banks; white-collar workers (clerks, office and shop staff) lost their jobs in large numbers; civil servants and teachers kept their jobs but Brüning's decrees cut their salaries several times; university graduates and students faced no prospect of work; savings were threatened - the banking crisis of July 1931 (collapse of the Danat Bank, banks closed for days) revived memories of 1923, when hyperinflation had wiped out middle-class savings; loss of status - fear of sinking into the working class; fear of communism - the KPD grew from 54 seats (1928) to 100 (November 1932) and promised to abolish private property; political change - middle-class voters deserted the liberal and conservative parties (the DVP fell from 45 seats in 1928 to 7 in July 1932, the DNVP from 73 to 37) and turned to the Nazis, who promised order, protection of property and help for small businesses.

Question 4

12 marks

Which of the following was the more important reason for the growth in Nazi support in the years 1929-1932:
- the role of the SA
- Nazi propaganda?
Explain your answer with reference to both bullet points.

Model answer

Both the SA and propaganda helped the Nazis to grow from 2.6% of the vote in 1928 to 37.3% in July 1932, but I think propaganda was the more important reason because it reached and persuaded far more voters.

The SA played an important role. Under Ernst Röhm, who took over in 1931, it grew to about 400,000 men by 1932. It protected Nazi meetings from opponents and broke up the meetings of Communists and Social Democrats, so the Nazi message was heard while rivals were silenced. Its uniformed marches gave an impression of discipline and strength, and its street battles with Communists allowed the Nazis to pose as the defenders of Germany against the 'Reds', which appealed to the middle classes. The SA also recruited unemployed young men with meals, hostels and uniforms. However, its violence could put voters off. Brüning's government banned the SA in April 1932, and the Potempa murder of August 1932, when SA men killed a Communist worker, shocked many respectable Germans.

Propaganda was more important. Joseph Goebbels, in charge from 1930, used simple slogans such as 'Work and bread' and 'Germany awake!' and designed messages for every group: posters like 'Our last hope: Hitler' targeted the unemployed, while farmers, women and the middle classes were given promises of their own. Propaganda built up the image of Hitler as a strong leader above the squabbling parties, and in the 1932 presidential election the 'Hitler over Germany' flights helped him win 36.8% of the vote in the second round. It also offered scapegoats, blaming Jews, Communists and the 'November Criminals' for Germany's suffering.

The two were linked, because SA marches were themselves a kind of propaganda and SA men put up the posters. But propaganda was the more important reason, because it reached millions of people in every class, including women, farmers and pensioners who would never see an SA street fight. The SA could intimidate opponents, but it was propaganda that persuaded people to vote Nazi.

Explanation

The SA protected meetings, intimidated opponents and projected order but its violence alarmed some voters; propaganda (Goebbels, slogans, targeted posters, the Hitler cult) reached every group. Level 4 needs both bullets explained with precise knowledge and a sustained judgement, possibly showing how they worked together.

Mark scheme
  1. 12 marks

    Levels of response (12 marks).
    Level 4 (10-12 marks): Complex explanation of both bullet points leading to a sustained judgement, e.g. weighing the SA's protection of meetings, intimidation of opponents and image of order against Goebbels's targeted propaganda, slogans and the cult of Hitler, and judging which did more to win votes. Answers show a range of accurate, detailed knowledge (e.g. about 400,000 SA men, Altona, 'Our last hope: Hitler', 'Hitler over Germany') and the judgement is supported throughout.
    Level 3 (7-9 marks): Developed explanation of both bullet points, each supported with relevant knowledge; there may be a judgement but it is not sustained.
    Level 2 (4-6 marks): Simple explanation of one or both bullet points, with some relevant knowledge.
    Level 1 (1-3 marks): Basic explanation of one or both bullet points; general statements with little specific knowledge.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): The SA - led by Röhm from 1931, about 400,000 men by 1932; protected Nazi meetings and broke up opponents' meetings; street battles with Communists made the Nazis look like the defenders of order against the 'Reds'; uniformed marches gave an image of discipline and strength; recruited unemployed young men with food, hostels and uniforms; did propaganda work (posters, leaflets); but its violence (Altona, July 1932; Potempa, August 1932) alarmed many voters and led to the ban of April 1932. Propaganda - Goebbels in charge from 1930; simple slogans ('Work and bread', 'Germany awake!'); targeted posters and promises for farmers, workers, the middle classes, women and the unemployed; the cult of Hitler as a strong leader above the parties; staged rallies; 'Hitler over Germany' flights in the 1932 presidential campaign (36.8% in the second round); scapegoating Jews, Communists and the 'November Criminals'; publicity from Hugenberg's newspapers in the Young Plan campaign (1929); propaganda reached millions who never met an SA man. Links - SA marches were themselves a form of propaganda; propaganda only worked because the Depression made people desperate. Judgement - credit either, e.g. propaganda mattered more because it reached and persuaded voters in every class, or the SA mattered more because it gave the Nazis a physical presence and silenced opponents.

Ready to try the rest? Every answer you write is marked against the mark scheme, so you can see exactly where the marks are.

AI Tutor Hints first, answers after you try

Hi! Stuck? Ask me for a hint and I’ll help you work it out. Once you’ve checked your answer I can explain exactly where the marks are.