Interpretation A: from the memoirs of a man who joined the SA in Berlin in 1930 after losing his job, published in 1958. (Written for practice.)
When the factory closed I had nothing: no money, no work and no hope. The SA gave me a brown shirt, hot meals in the SA hostel and comrades who stood by each other. We marched through the streets to show Germany that there was still order and discipline. Yes, there were fights, but the Reds attacked our meetings first and the police did nothing. We protected Hitler's speakers so that people could hear the truth. For thousands of unemployed young men like me, the SA was a family.
Interpretation B: from an interview with a woman who lived in a working-class district of Hamburg in 1932, recorded in 1980. (Written for practice.)
The SA came into our streets to provoke us. They marched through districts where they knew they were hated, singing their songs and looking for a fight. They broke up our meetings, beat up Communists and Social Democrats and smashed windows. People were frightened to put up posters or say what they thought. In the summer of 1932 there was shooting in Altona and people were killed. The SA did not bring order; they created the chaos, so that Hitler could pretend that only he could end it.
How does Interpretation B differ from Interpretation A about the role of the SA? Explain your answer based on what it says in Interpretations A and B.
Model answer
Interpretation A presents the SA as a positive force. The author says it gave unemployed men like him a brown shirt, hot meals and comrades, so it was 'a family'. He claims its marches showed 'order and discipline', and that its fighting was only self-defence, because 'the Reds attacked our meetings first' and the SA was simply protecting Hitler's speakers so people could hear the truth.
Interpretation B takes the opposite view. The woman says the SA came into working-class streets 'to provoke us' and was 'looking for a fight'. It broke up meetings, beat up Communists and Social Democrats and frightened people into silence, and she remembers the shooting in Altona in 1932. Rather than bringing order, B argues the SA 'created the chaos' on purpose, so that Hitler could pretend only he could end it. So A sees the SA as a source of support and order, while B sees it as a source of deliberate terror.
Explanation
The difference lies in the content: A stresses the SA's help for the unemployed, its discipline and defensive fighting; B stresses provocation, intimidation and deliberately created chaos. Level 2 explains the difference with support from both interpretations.