Level:
Correct: 0
Incorrect: 0
Marks: 0/0
Exam Practice
Subject:
Topics:
Avg
score:
–
Topics
done:
0/9

Post-war American society and economy

Practise 44 exam-style questions on Post-war American society and economy for AQA GCSE History (America 1920-1973). Write your answer as you would in the exam and get it marked in seconds against the mark scheme, point by point, with an AI tutor on hand if you get stuck.

  • 44 questions
  • 1–12 marks each
  • Instant marking
  • No sign-up needed
20 questions, marked as you go

Sample questions with model answers

Here are 4 of the questions in this topic, each with a model answer, an explanation of why it earns the marks and the mark scheme an examiner would use.

Question 1

1 mark

Name the radio disc jockey who helped to make the term 'rock and roll' popular in the early 1950s, first in Cleveland and then in New York.

Model answer

Alan Freed.

Explanation

Alan Freed played rhythm and blues records by African-American artists to a mixed audience on his Cleveland radio show from 1951, calling the music 'rock and roll', and moved to New York in 1954. He organised concerts with integrated audiences, but his career was ruined by the 'payola' scandal of 1959-60, when disc jockeys were found to have taken money to play records.

Mark scheme
  1. 1 mark

    Alan Freed.

    Accept Freed. Do not accept Dick Clark (presenter of 'American Bandstand') or Sam Phillips (Sun Records).

Question 2

4 marks

Read Interpretations A and B and answer the question.

Interpretation A: from a speech by a Republican congressman supporting Senator McCarthy, made in 1953. (Written for practice.)
Senator McCarthy is doing the job that the last government refused to do. For years we were told there were no Communists in government. Then Alger Hiss, a former senior State Department official, was convicted. Then we learned that the secrets of the atomic bomb had been passed to Moscow. The men in the Kremlin did not get the bomb by luck. If the Senator's methods are rough, so be it: we are at war with a ruthless enemy, and those who attack him are protecting the traitors.

Interpretation B: from the memoirs of a Hollywood screenwriter who was blacklisted in the 1950s, published in 1976. (Written for practice.)
It was a witch-hunt. People who had joined a left-wing group in the hungry days of the Depression were dragged before committees and ordered to name their friends. Refuse, and you were finished. The studios dropped us, and I wrote scripts under false names for a fraction of my old pay. Not one of my friends had ever passed a secret to anyone. McCarthy and the committees did not catch spies; they spread fear, until ordinary Americans were afraid to sign a petition or speak their minds.

How does Interpretation B differ from Interpretation A about McCarthyism? Explain your answer based on what it says in Interpretations A and B.

Model answer

Interpretation A argues that McCarthy was doing necessary work against a real threat. It says that the previous government had denied there were Communists in government, but that Alger Hiss was convicted and atomic secrets were 'passed to Moscow', so McCarthy's rough methods are justified because 'we are at war with a ruthless enemy'. It even claims his critics are 'protecting the traitors'. Interpretation B argues that McCarthyism was 'a witch-hunt'. It says that innocent people who had joined left-wing groups in the Depression were forced to name their friends, lost their careers and had to work under false names, and that 'not one' of them had passed on secrets. Whereas A sees McCarthy as catching traitors, B says the committees 'did not catch spies; they spread fear'.

Explanation

The key difference is whether McCarthyism was a justified response to real traitors (A) or a witch-hunt against innocent people (B). Level 2 needs the difference explained with support from both, such as A's references to Hiss and atomic secrets against B's claim that no spies were caught.

Mark scheme
  1. 4 marks

    Levels of response (4 marks).
    Level 2 (3-4 marks): Developed analysis of the interpretations: explains how they differ about McCarthyism, supported by the content of both (e.g. A argues there was a real threat of Communist traitors, which McCarthy was right to tackle even with rough methods; B argues it was a witch-hunt that ruined innocent people, caught no spies and spread fear).
    Level 1 (1-2 marks): Simple analysis: identifies a difference from the content of one or both interpretations (e.g. A supports McCarthy and B opposes him), with little or no support.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): A says McCarthy 'is doing the job that the last government refused to do'; B calls it 'a witch-hunt'. A points to real traitors - Hiss convicted, atomic secrets 'passed to Moscow'; B says 'not one of my friends had ever passed a secret to anyone' and that the committees 'did not catch spies'. A accepts rough methods because 'we are at war with a ruthless enemy'; B shows the human cost - people forced to name friends, careers 'finished', writing under false names. A says McCarthy's critics are 'protecting the traitors'; B says McCarthyism 'spread fear' so ordinary Americans were afraid to speak their minds.

Question 3

8 marks

Read Interpretations A and B and answer the question.

Interpretation A: from a textbook on the American economy written by an economist in 1975. (Written for practice.)
The post-war boom was built on government spending. The GI Bill sent millions of veterans to college and helped them to buy homes. Washington guaranteed mortgages, built 41,000 miles of interstate highways and, above all, spent tens of billions of dollars a year on defence during the Cold War. Whole industries - aircraft, electronics, the new computer firms - and whole regions such as California depended on government contracts. Without Washington's dollars, the boom of the 1950s would have been much smaller.

Interpretation B: from the memoirs of a car dealer from Ohio, published in 1968. (Written for practice.)
People today forget who really built the prosperity of the fifties. It was not the politicians in Washington; it was American business and the American family. Companies brought out new products every year - better cars, refrigerators, televisions - and advertised them so that people wanted them. Families who had saved through the war were ready to spend, and hire purchase let a young couple drive away a new car for a few dollars a week. Free enterprise gave Americans the highest standard of living in history.

Which interpretation gives the more convincing opinion about the causes of prosperity in the 1950s? Explain your answer based on your contextual knowledge and what it says in Interpretations A and B.

Model answer

Interpretation A is more convincing, although Interpretation B describes an important part of the boom.

Interpretation A argues that the boom was built on government spending. There is strong evidence for this. The GI Bill helped about 2 million veterans to go to college and millions more to buy homes with government-backed loans, which fuelled the building of suburbs such as Levittown. The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 funded about 41,000 miles of highways. Above all, the Cold War and the Korean War meant that defence took more than half of all federal spending in the 1950s, supporting the aircraft and electronics industries and the rapid growth of California.

Interpretation B argues that business and families created the prosperity. This is partly convincing. Americans had large savings from the war, when rationing left little to buy, and consumer credit grew from under 10 billion dollars in 1945 to over 50 billion by 1960, helped by hire purchase and new credit cards such as Diners Club (1950). Advertising, much of it on television, persuaded people to buy new cars, refrigerators and televisions; by 1960 about 87% of homes had a television. However, B was written by a car dealer whose business depended on consumer spending, so he was bound to see things this way, and he ignores how much his customers' jobs, homes and roads depended on the government.

Overall, A is more convincing, because government spending created many of the jobs, homes and roads that made consumer spending possible in the first place. Consumer spending, advertising and credit kept the boom going, so B describes how prosperity spread, but A better explains what underpinned it.

Explanation

The boom had both government causes (the GI Bill, defence spending, highways) and private ones (savings, credit, advertising, new products). Level 4 needs both interpretations tested against specific knowledge with a sustained judgement, for example arguing that government spending created the conditions for consumer spending.

Mark scheme
  1. 8 marks

    Levels of response (8 marks).
    Level 4 (7-8 marks): Complex evaluation of both interpretations, using accurate contextual knowledge (e.g. the GI Bill, defence spending, the Highway Act, wartime savings, advertising, credit and new products), leading to a sustained judgement about which is more convincing about the causes of prosperity.
    Level 3 (5-6 marks): Developed evaluation of both interpretations based on contextual knowledge.
    Level 2 (3-4 marks): Simple evaluation of one interpretation based on contextual knowledge.
    Level 1 (1-2 marks): Basic analysis of one or both interpretations; assertion or paraphrase without relevant knowledge.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): Supporting A: the GI Bill (1944) - about 2 million veterans went to college and millions bought homes with government-backed loans; FHA mortgages; the Federal-Aid Highway Act (1956) - about 41,000 miles, about 25 billion dollars; Cold War and Korean War defence spending - more than half of federal spending in the 1950s - supported aircraft, electronics and computers and the growth of California; the Marshall Plan (about 13 billion dollars) helped Europe buy American goods. Supporting B: Americans had large wartime savings; consumer credit grew from under 10 billion dollars in 1945 to over 50 billion by 1960 (Diners Club card, 1950); advertising spending roughly doubled in the 1950s, much of it on television; new products and annual car models; the baby boom and suburbs created demand; median family income rose from about 3,000 dollars (1947) to about 5,600 (1960); about 87% of homes had a television by 1960. Limits: A ignores consumers and business; B ignores how far wages, homes and roads depended on government. Provenance: B is a car dealer with an interest in praising free enterprise. Possible judgements: A more convincing because government spending underpinned the jobs and homes that made consumer spending possible; B more convincing because consumer spending was the largest part of the economy; or both causes worked together - credit a sustained case for any.

Question 4

12 marks

Which of the following was the more important reason why many Americans did not share in the American Dream in the 1950s:

• racial discrimination
• poverty in rural areas?

Explain your answer with reference to both bullet points.

Model answer

Racial discrimination was a major reason why many Americans did not share in the American Dream. In the South, segregation laws kept African-Americans in separate, poorer schools, most were denied the vote, and many could only find low-paid work. In the North, black workers faced discrimination in jobs, and they were shut out of the new suburbs: Levittown and many other estates would not sell to black families, and banks 'redlined' black neighbourhoods, so even black veterans could not use GI Bill home loans in the same way as white veterans. As a result, black family incomes were only about half those of white families, and over half of African-Americans were poor in 1959. Mexican-Americans and Native Americans also faced discrimination.

Poverty in rural areas was also important. In Appalachia, coal mining was mechanised and small farms could not compete, leaving many families without work, with poor housing, schools and health care. In the South, mechanical cotton pickers pushed sharecroppers, black and white, off the land, and the number of Americans living on farms fell from about 24 million in 1945 to about 16 million in 1960. Native Americans on reservations and migrant farm workers were among the poorest Americans of all. In total about 22% of Americans were poor in 1959, and most poor Americans were white.

Racial discrimination was the more important reason. Rural poverty affected more people in total, but it was a problem of particular places and industries, and people could escape it by moving to the cities, as millions did. Discrimination followed African-Americans wherever they went: even a black family with a good income in a northern city could be refused a house in the suburbs or a loan from a bank. The two overlapped, because black sharecroppers suffered both, but discrimination shut people out of the Dream because of who they were, not just because of where they lived or what they earned.

Explanation

About 22% of Americans were poor in 1959: racial discrimination excluded African-Americans wherever they lived, while rural poverty affected millions, most of them white, in places such as Appalachia. Level 4 needs a sustained judgement weighing the two, for example the number of people affected against how far people could escape.

Mark scheme
  1. 12 marks

    Levels of response (12 marks).
    Level 4 (10-12 marks): Complex explanation of both bullet points (racial discrimination and rural poverty), with specific, accurate knowledge, leading to a sustained judgement about which did more to keep Americans out of the American Dream (e.g. weighing the numbers affected against the depth and permanence of exclusion, or showing how the two overlapped for black sharecroppers).
    Level 3 (7-9 marks): Developed explanation of both bullet points, supported by accurate knowledge; a judgement may be given but is not sustained.
    Level 2 (4-6 marks): Simple explanation of one or both bullet points, with some relevant knowledge.
    Level 1 (1-3 marks): Basic explanation of one or both bullet points; general or descriptive statements.
    0 marks: nothing worthy of credit.

    Indicative content (not a checklist; credit other valid points): Racial discrimination: Jim Crow segregation in the South - separate schools and facilities, denial of the vote, low-paid jobs; in the North, discrimination in jobs and housing; Levittown and other estates sold only to whites; banks and the FHA 'redlined' black neighbourhoods; black family incomes about half those of white families; over half of African-Americans were poor in 1959; even black veterans could not use GI Bill home loans in the same way; Mexican-Americans and Native Americans also faced discrimination; television showed the Dream as white. Rural poverty: Appalachia - mechanisation of coal mining and the decline of small farms; poor housing, schools and health; southern sharecroppers, black and white, pushed off the land by mechanical cotton pickers; the farm population fell from about 24 million (1945) to about 16 million (1960); Native American reservations; migrant farm workers. Most poor Americans were white, and many lived in rural areas; about 22% of all Americans were poor in 1959. Links: black sharecroppers suffered both; many rural poor moved to cities, where black migrants met discrimination. Possible judgements: discrimination more important because it shut out even prosperous African-Americans, whatever their income or where they lived; or rural poverty more important because it affected more people in total, most of them white.

Ready to try the rest? Every answer you write is marked against the mark scheme, so you can see exactly where the marks are.

AI Tutor Hints first, answers after you try

Hi! Stuck? Ask me for a hint and I’ll help you work it out. Once you’ve checked your answer I can explain exactly where the marks are.