Tutor HuntResources Maths Resources
Bottling Company Case Study
Data analysis and report writing
Date : 06/03/2017
Author Information
Uploaded by : James
Uploaded on : 06/03/2017
Subject : Maths
IntroductionThe customers have been
complaining that the ounces in the bottle are less than 16. There are reasons
that could be leading to this and the manager has decided to investigate the
reason for this. From the case study, the results will be able to tell if the
complains by the customers is true. This is achieved by taking at random 30
bottles of soda and recording their ounces and presented for analysis. Descri ptive
statistics From the data that is
sampled from 30 bottles, the mean value of the sample is 14.87 while the
standard deviation is 0.55. The mean and the mode are 14.8 and 14.8 respectively.
This information is obtained from the descri ptive statistics of the data shown
below.
Ounces
Mean 14.87 Standard Error 0.100475879 Median 14.8 Mode 14.8 Standard Deviation 0.550329055 Sample Variance 0.302862069 Kurtosis 0.105226406 Skewness 0.641561718 Range 2.1 Minimum 14 Maximum 16.1 Sum 446.1 Count 30 95% Confidence intervalTo conduct the 95% confident interval, we have to follow the z-distribution since the sample size (n) is equal to 30. This means . The confidence interval is therefore calculated using the formula below (Smithson, 2010). In this case study, n=30, is the sample mean and .These values are substituted in the formula above to give(14.87+0.197), (14.87-0.197)=(15.07, 14.67)Hypothesis testingSince the customers have been complaining, we need to test if the mean is lower than 16 ounces. This is done by first formulating the hypothesis that will help us test the study (Wilcox, 2012). The null hypothesis will be the mean ounce is equal to 16 which will be tested against the alternative hypothesis stated as the mean ounce is less than 16. This is mathematically written as We are going to calculate the z statistic since the value of n=30. This is done using the formulaThis is substituted as ZZ=-11.25In this case study, n=30, is the sample mean and The critical value at When we compare the calculated value of z and the Z value from the table, it is clear that z-calculated is lower than the z-statistic from the tables. (-).Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to make a conclusion based on the study that the mean ounce in the bottles is less than 16. Reasons for the problemSince I have concluded that there are less than 16 ounces in the bottles, there are reasons as to why this could happen in the company.The first reason that can cause the ounce to be less than the expected in the bottles is failure of the machine. The machine could be having less time that it takes to feel the bottle. The machine should be checked to find out if this is the reason for the less than 16 ounces.Another reason as to why this could be happening is the bottle top size. The bottle mouths could be small such that when the bottle is getting filled, some soda is pouring out. The company should investigate on the changes in the bottle size.Finally, the belt that the bottles move as they get filled could be moving fast and little time is being taken to fill the bottle. The company should check the speed of the bottle belt and make changes if so that the ounces can be maintained at 16 ounces.
Mean 14.87 Standard Error 0.100475879 Median 14.8 Mode 14.8 Standard Deviation 0.550329055 Sample Variance 0.302862069 Kurtosis 0.105226406 Skewness 0.641561718 Range 2.1 Minimum 14 Maximum 16.1 Sum 446.1 Count 30 95% Confidence intervalTo conduct the 95% confident interval, we have to follow the z-distribution since the sample size (n) is equal to 30. This means . The confidence interval is therefore calculated using the formula below (Smithson, 2010). In this case study, n=30, is the sample mean and .These values are substituted in the formula above to give(14.87+0.197), (14.87-0.197)=(15.07, 14.67)Hypothesis testingSince the customers have been complaining, we need to test if the mean is lower than 16 ounces. This is done by first formulating the hypothesis that will help us test the study (Wilcox, 2012). The null hypothesis will be the mean ounce is equal to 16 which will be tested against the alternative hypothesis stated as the mean ounce is less than 16. This is mathematically written as We are going to calculate the z statistic since the value of n=30. This is done using the formulaThis is substituted as ZZ=-11.25In this case study, n=30, is the sample mean and The critical value at When we compare the calculated value of z and the Z value from the table, it is clear that z-calculated is lower than the z-statistic from the tables. (-).Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to make a conclusion based on the study that the mean ounce in the bottles is less than 16. Reasons for the problemSince I have concluded that there are less than 16 ounces in the bottles, there are reasons as to why this could happen in the company.The first reason that can cause the ounce to be less than the expected in the bottles is failure of the machine. The machine could be having less time that it takes to feel the bottle. The machine should be checked to find out if this is the reason for the less than 16 ounces.Another reason as to why this could be happening is the bottle top size. The bottle mouths could be small such that when the bottle is getting filled, some soda is pouring out. The company should investigate on the changes in the bottle size.Finally, the belt that the bottles move as they get filled could be moving fast and little time is being taken to fill the bottle. The company should check the speed of the bottle belt and make changes if so that the ounces can be maintained at 16 ounces.
This resource was uploaded by: James