Tutor HuntResources Accountancy Resources

Ias 19 And Employee's Benefits

IAS 19 and Employee's Benefits

Date : 23/03/2013

Author Information

Abdul Qayoum

Uploaded by : Abdul Qayoum
Uploaded on : 23/03/2013
Subject : Accountancy

INTRODUCTION The entire world has been moving with an accelerating pace which apprises continuously that the world is on the peak of innovation and globalization in which any happening can have a significant effect over the other thing instantly. It has been seen that many people still not differentiate between accounts and finance, although both these things are totally different from each other. Finance is the name of accumulating and investing funds of the organization in a place where it gets optimal return, above its weighted average cost of capital (WACC) (Vernimmen, P, pp. 14, 2000). On the other side, accounting is the name of recording and interpreting the financial data and activities of the day to day operations of the company. Literally both of these operations are quite important for an organization to run in a professional manner. The main prospective of this study is to do an ad hoc research about the International Accounting Standard 19 and how much the organizations adhering with this standards and how it can be a positive sign for the viewers to take effective economic decisions. This piece of work is not easy at all and it certainly requires extensive research and study that is why the researcher has decided to go along with the topic in a manner that it will be fully understandable for every reader. At first the researcher will define the International Accounting Standard Board (hereafter IASB) and something about the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Proceeds with our topic, we will then go for the IAS 19 regarding the employee's benefits and up to what extent companies are adhering with this accounting standard.

SHORT AND SNAPPY BACKGROUND OF IASB The IASB has a conceptual framework underlying its financial reporting standards and interpretations, the Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements (the Framework). The Framework sets out the concepts that underlie the preparation and presentation of financial statements for external users. The framework for the preparation and presentation of the financial statements adopted by the International accounting standard board (IASB) is known as International Financial Reporting Standard, IFRS provides a procedure norms, rules and regulation that how to prepare and present the financial statements, what data must be included and what should be omitted. Most of the standards which come under the umbrella of IFRS are previously known as the International Accounting Standard (IAS). IAS was issued between 1973 and 2001 by the International Accounting Standard Committee (Lewis, R & Pendrill, D, pp. 78, 2004) Financial reporting has been used, in order to give a brief an idea to the external users regarding the gauging of financial health of the organization. Management used this information for decision making, fill disparity and reduce any kind of caveats, which the entity may envisage. International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) is the regulator who regulates the countries and accounting bodies to implement the International Accounting Standards (IAS) in their financial statements, and disclose things according to the yardstick (Rachev, S.T & Fabozi, F.J 2008, pp. 105). Albeit, the IASB has a very clear and conceptual framework underlying its financial reporting standards and interpretation, which is known as the name of Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements (Framework). The framework for the presentation and preparation which was known as international Accounting Standard (IAS) recently is known as International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) (International Financial Reporting Standards, retrieved from www.IASB.org). IAS was issued and being implement between 1973 and 2001 (IFRS, pp. 45, 2007). IFRS provides rules & regulation, norms regarding the disclosure of financial information in the books of Accounts (International Financial Reporting Standard Volume 2007, pg. 67). If factually, speaking then one can say that IFRS made some standards which public listed as well as private limited companies has to follow in order to save them from being penalized. International Accounting Standard Committee (IASC) set out some rules and regulation regarding the disclosure of the information, which clearly elaborates by the regulating body IASB regarding the mandatory disclosure and omit it (International Financial Reporting Standards, retrieved from www.IASB.org). Things are moving and changing instantly in the entire world, but IFRS is still unfamiliar to most of the people even not the accountants.

IAS 19 "EMPLOYEES BENEFITS" The International Accounting Standards Board ('IASB') and the United States Financial Accounting Standards Board ('FASB') are committed to a long time review of the pecuniary exposure of pensions. In economies in which worker's profit obligations are significant, it is important that there is a high degree of confidence in the pecuniary treatment of pensions by employers and by worker repayment devices. However, the financial reporting of pensions has recently been the specialty of significant controversy. The profit deficits of many companies have attracted much mention, particularly in the context of corporate transactions (e.g. takeovers and disposals) and disclose valuations. IASB has proposed an ad hoc accounting normal regarding the worker's repayment, which can be real for the listeners and analysts to take chief economic and economic decisions (International Financial Reporting Standard Volume 2007, pg. 78) IAS 19 "Employee Benefits" was originally issued in 1983 and subsequently revised in 1993, 1998 and 2000. The Standard prescribes the accounting and disclosure by employers for employee payback. It replaces IAS 19 Retirement Benefit Costs, which was approved in 1993. The major changes from the old IAS 19 are set out in the Basis for Conclusions the Standard prescribes the style in which employers must deal with accounting and disclosure of information about employee benefits. Supersedes IAS 19, Cost of retirement subsidy, which was adopted in 1993, the goal of this standard is to prescribe the accounting treatment and disclosure of financial information in respect of employee benefits. This Standard requires companies to recognize: A. A liability when the employee has provided service in exchange for the right to receive payments in the future and B. An expense when the enterprise has consumed the economic benefit from the service provided by the employee in exchange for fees in question. The Standard identifies five categories of employee benefits: A. Short-term employee benefits, such as wages, salaries and social security contributions, paid annual leave and paid sick leave, profit sharing and bonuses (if payable within twelve months of the end of the period) and non-monetary benefits (such as medical care, housing, cars and free or subsidized goods or services) for current employees; B. Post-employment benefits such as pensions, other retirement benefits, post-employment life insurance and post-employment medical care; C. Other long-term employee benefits, including long-service leave or sabbatical leave, jubilee or other long-service benefits, long-term disability benefits and, if they are payable twelve months or more after the end of the period, profit sharing, bonuses and deferred compensation; D. Termination benefits; These include lump sum payments, enhanced retirement benefits or other post employment benefits and salaries paid until the end of a specified period even though no service is rendered by the related employee. E. Equity compensation benefits. These include benefits in such forms as (a) shares, share options, and other equity instruments issued to employees at less than the fair value at which they are issued to third parties and (b) cash payments the amount of which depend on the future market value of the enterprise's shares. IAS 19 does not treaty with the recognition of fairness compensation repayment, but has large disclosure requirements about such payback. In the long-term, actuarial gains and losses may offset one another. Therefore, estimates of post-employment benefit obligations are best viewed as a range (or `corridor`) around the best estimate (International Financial Reporting Standard Volume 2007, pg. 111). An enterprise is permitted, but not required, to recognize actuarial gains and losses that fall within that range. This Standard requires an enterprise to recognize, as a minimum, a specified portion of the actuarial gains and losses that fall outside a `corridor` of plus or minus 10%. Where an enterprise reduces benefits payable under an existing defined benefit plan, the resulting reduction in the defined benefit liability is recognized as (negative) past service cost over the average period until the reduced portion of the benefits becomes vested. IAS 19 does not want instant recognition of actuarial gains and losses save the fluctuations in them are so great that deferral is not deemed appropriate. The Standard takes the landscape that actuarial gains and losses may offset one another in the long label. Thus, IAS 19 defines a 10% corridor as the series of usual variations in gains and losses. If the unrecognized actuarial return or harm is no more than 10% of the superior of the submit regard of the distinct grows obligation or the blond merit of prepare assets, precise at the start of the year, it is not recognized that is, there will be continuous deferral of the accumulated net actuarial obtain or pasting. However, if the accumulated net actuarial addition or injury exceeds the corridor, the leftover is amortized over the projected lasting working lives of the then active worker participants. The Standard permits other amortization methods specialty to certain conditions. The unrecognized cumulative actuarial gains and losses (composing those declining inside the corridor and those further the corridor, but not recognized in the proceeds avowal) will form part of the net late promote liability or asset. IAS 19 allows postponed recognition of actuarial gains and losses. It also imposes a superior frontier on the total that can be recognized as an asset (asset ceiling). The interaction of late recognition and asset ceiling has given ascend to a circumstance such that sometimes deferring the recognition of an actuarial slaughter (acquire) leads to a gain (hurt) being recognized in the proceeds speech. The unruly affects only those entities that have at the beginning or end of the stop, a surplus in a clear promote design that based on the existing terms of propose, the enterprise cannot insincere claim through refunds or reductions in prospect contributions.

COMPLIANCE OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR IAS 19 Employees are the most important things for an organization and employers have to adopt and employ such strategies which have an absolute commerce with the job satisfaction of the employees and their custody (Lewis, R & Pendrill, D 2004, pg. 75). Study reveals that the organizations which have pleased employees are more productive and capable than that organization whose employees are not pleased. IAS 19 prescribed several scenarios which should be recorded in the lucrative statements like the worker's profit, schooling & development, salaries and wages, Pension; Employee Old age Benefit Incentive (EOBI) etc. It has been consensus that there are few companies which are actually adhering with this IAS and describe this gear concerning their employees in their economic statements. Usually organizations do not explosion such things in their fiscal statements because this defeat of information manipulation of records can be viable. According to Income tax professionals, employers generally evidence high salaries and wages expenses while making their pecuniary statements to reduction its base line which account for low corporation tax. IAS 19 allows the companies to induce their employees to participate in the sheep options of the group. The criterion said that, organization must give ample opportunity to its employees to take stocks of the business on relatively low quantity as compared to the allocate's unique intrinsic worth. IAS 19 also mandates the organization to article vacancies time to time in the organization. Place may be formed through produce termination of a worker or a worker's voluntarily verdict of resign. It has been consensus that, home hiring is so mutual in the organizations that is really a wrong and immoral activity which also prohibited by the IAS 19. Unfortunately, there is no stringent law on the organization that are not taking this activity and cassette as solemn as any other thing. According to the Human Resources Professionals measure, the intentions of the organization to not give and details the worker's payback will pointer to grave dissatisfaction of a worker from his job. Corporate Governance doctrine has mentioned several time about the employee's satisfaction and sell selection, but no resolute realize has been envisaged from the organization border. Such lacking can produce several troubles for the organizations in their future so they have to practice themselves for any kind of accident.

IAS 19 AND THE INSTANCE OF TAKING ECONOMIC DECISIONS Investment and economic decisions are forever tiring to take because of its change spirit. The domain of investment is so broad, and there are several methods to take up the economic decisions. Investors and analysts suitable ensure the financial statements of the organization in which they wish to commons his money. A backer has to dissect the band from different angles and slants before import the stock of a particular group. Good employment custody ratio is actually a confirmed show for the sake of an organization because, as we have just mentioned prior the happy employees are more productive than unsatisfied employees and such satisfaction eventually has a express call with the revenue generation for an organization. Investors think that the troupe that is paying its employee on time and good salaries and fringe benefits than it will sure give a returns in the form of payment to their shareholders.

CONCLUSION The assignment on which the researcher has worked is indeed difficult because it required ad hoc, extensive and prudent research. There are a number of standards which must be complying by the organization in order to operate with their full capacity and momentum. Out of that International Accounting Standards (IAS), we have selected one important IAS which related to the employees benefits. The IAS name is IAS 19 which allows the organizations to report all the privileges given to the employees in their financial report. Professionals say that such disclosures will assist the analysts and investors to take effective and timely economic decisions regarding putting their money in the company stocks. We have seen and discussed each and everything in details which would be quite beneficial for all the readers. REFERENCES Appelbaum, B, Leonnig, C, & Hilzenrath, D., 2009. "How Washington Failed to Rein In Fannie, Freddie", The Washington retrieved on 2009-03-08.

Bernanke, B., 2009. "Lesson of the financial crisis for banking supervision", retrieved from www.bis.org".

Erich A. Helfert., 2001. Financial Analysis: Tool and Techniques: A Guide for managers, McGraw-hill Professional Publishers, 1999.

Gullapalli, D & Anand, S., 2008. "Bailout of Money Funds Seems to Stanch Outflow", The Wall Street Journal, September 20, 2008.

International Monetary Fund Report., 2007. Available at< www.imf.org>[Accessed October 10, 2010.

International Financial Reporting Standard Volume, 007. Edition: 1 & 2, University Publications.

Lewis, R & Pendrill, D., 2004. Advance Financial Accounting Edition: 7, British Library.

Leopard, A & Bernstein, J., 1999. Analysis of Financial Statements, Edition, 5, McGraw-hill Professional Publishers, 1999.

Rachev, S.T & Fabozi, F.J., 2008. Bayesian Methods in Finance, John Willey & Sons Publisher.

Sorkin, R., 2008. "Lehman Files for Bankruptcy; Merrill Is Sold" The New York Times September 14, 2008.

Vernimmen, P., 2000. "Corporate Finance - Theory & Practice", Prentice Hall Publications.

This resource was uploaded by: Abdul Qayoum